PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to A Comm for Historymemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 days agoThere's no way this could go wronglemmy.worldimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10
arrow-up14arrow-down1imageThere's no way this could go wronglemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.worldM to A Comm for Historymemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareuntakenusername@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·15 days agoI’m fine with an armed population, as long as people that might harm themselves or do mass shootings cant get weapons.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days ago“people who do mass shootings can’t get weapons” just means “everybody gets to do one mass shooting but no more”
minus-squareuntakenusername@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·14 days agoOr just implement a process to check the mental health of people who want to get guns, and if theyre insane and are at risk of doing that, then they dont get the guns
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-214 days agoI reread your comment and I think I parsed it differently than the way you intended it. what you said: people that might harm themselves or do mass shootings what you certainly must have meant by it: people who might: harm themselves do mass shootings the way I read it: people who: might harm themselves do mass shootings so there’s where my comment comes from.
I’m fine with an armed population, as long as people that might harm themselves or do mass shootings cant get weapons.
“people who do mass shootings can’t get weapons” just means “everybody gets to do one mass shooting but no more”
Or just implement a process to check the mental health of people who want to get guns, and if theyre insane and are at risk of doing that, then they dont get the guns
I reread your comment and I think I parsed it differently than the way you intended it.
what you said:
what you certainly must have meant by it:
the way I read it:
so there’s where my comment comes from.