• matchaotter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      My job basically requires that I use Chrome (I work for a SaaS company whose product’s advance features only work on Chromium). Vivaldi has, at least so far, performed the best, offered the most customization that suited my needs, and isn’t Chrome/Edge. I liked Arc as well, but it has the same issues that Vivaldi has.

      I don’t like Brave due to its push of AI/crypto, and Opera doesn’t really work with some of our internal apps.

      As a decades long Firefox user it sucks, but I don’t have much of a choice when it comes to work. It’s tough finding alternatives built on Chromium that accomplish everything I need without there being some major caveat.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 day ago

        sure. i also dislike that it’s a closed source product created by a private company that could rug pull all the users to turn a quick buck at any time. they haven’t in the last 10 years, and come from a legacy of a company that was very respectful of their customers (opera) but you could also argue the legacy of opera being bought by a spyware company was the last rugpull and that vivaldi will inevitably do the same. but that’s a more abstract complaint

        • hOrni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          54 minutes ago

          Dude. The day any other browser comes close to the functionality of Vivaldi, I’ll switch. But from my experience with Firefox and Brave, that’s far in the future.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            48 minutes ago

            what functionality do other browsers lack? i really mean it. my question is “why vivaldi of all things” and i still don’t think i know