Definitely the best Pope there ever was (especially when compared to the super reactionary ones.)

  • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    ^This. The bar for a better pope is really low. I did, however, enjoy some Catholics freaking out over some of the more progressive things he said.

    • burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      For people in Latin America who were part of the left leaning Catholics, such as myself, the pope, even with all his limitations, were good news. He also delayed the advance of some very reactionary elements in the Catholic church, which is still majoritary in Latin American countries such as Brazil. So even knowing his problems (including his participation in Argentinian dictatorship), I still think his term as the pope was positive.

        • beleza pura
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          i heard that was the trend in latin america from the 60s onwards, but then john paul the second feared the catholic church in latam would get too powerful and started moving power away from it (somehow)

          • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Religions often reflect the economic systems and class struggles; actual socialist forms of the religion would have been threat to the capitalism and feudal vestiges of the Holy See as an (European) institution. Sometimes it feels like if one really believed in a benevolent god then they would become a socialist but then I realise this is an idealistic non-materialistic approach to understanding humanity.