cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 4 days agoNew Mathlemmy.mlimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1837arrow-down112cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1825arrow-down1imageNew Mathlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square117fedilinkcross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-squarejacksilver@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up62·3 days agoThis is clearly about the US stock market crashing. In that case it’s always the days gain/loss, in which case Yang is the only person who is right. This is important because a lot of people saw “down 10%” and now “up 10%” without realizing that’s still day over day loss.
minus-squareHollowNaught@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoWhile the idea put forward by him is correct, stating that 100-10=90+9=99 is just entirely incorrect, hence why I’m saying they’re both somewhat correct
This is clearly about the US stock market crashing. In that case it’s always the days gain/loss, in which case Yang is the only person who is right.
This is important because a lot of people saw “down 10%” and now “up 10%” without realizing that’s still day over day loss.
While the idea put forward by him is correct, stating that 100-10=90+9=99 is just entirely incorrect, hence why I’m saying they’re both somewhat correct