• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    So they want to trade something that is almost always worth a lot for something that is sometimes worth a theoretical shitload or less than a loaf of bread, depending on the day?

    Brilliant, very good. Nothing stupid will come of this I’m sure. /s

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just when you think the clown car is full, that there is no way they will get another clown in there, clown world manages to cram another in.

    Again.

  • Pondis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I know this is old news, but how good would it be if they pissed a whole bunch of gold away on BitCoin and everyone dumped, tanking the price, and losing the US trillions of dollars.

    I mean good from a theoretical way, it would be absolutely devastating for the state of the world.

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The correct thing to do is ban all the digital coins.

    All they used for is tax avoidance. While raising electric bills

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Decent digital currency wouldnt use much electricity and would stop hyperinflation occuring in countries experiencing extreme issues. Being that taxes are standardly on income and sales, where is it you are saying they are dodging taxes? (Bitcoin isn’t a good digital currency, but neither should a decent one be run by the country)

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ethereum is probably the most well-known of the ‘proof-of-stake’ cryptocurrencies, which don’t require massive resources in order to generate/validate transactions. It made the switch back in 2022 I think?

  • MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    280
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    What a great fucking idea. Let’s take a physical limited resource mineral and trade it for an untraceable and unregulated made up currency.

    Holy shit I’m gonna have a stroke.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      136
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      If you want to reward your high profile friends so they can cash out with tangible assets before the whole currency or economy crashes, this is how you would do things.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        76
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Step 1: Put everything in crypto

        Step 2: Economy crashes, society no longer has power or running water.

        Step 3: Try to sell crypto but for some reason computer won’t turn on.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          8 days ago

          Step 4: the rich that bought the gold uses it to privatize all water and power to get it working again, now becomes even more rich.

        • kibiz0r@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Don’t worry, if you can’t afford a computer to manage your crypto, your employer can manage it for you (for a fee)

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      So couple things:

      1. Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies) are certainly not untraceable. Public ledger means that all the transactions are publicly visible - if you can associate a wallet to a person or organization then you know where the money went, and there are businesses that specifically do that kind of research. Every single transaction ever is part of the blockchain record. Cryptocurrency is a terrible way to make a clandestine purchase.
      2. All currencies are made up (I know, real imfourteenandthisisdeep energy, but still technicallythetruth).

      *Edit - A silly caveat to this is that if the US government starts regularly transacting in Bitcoin, it would be very easy to audit… using blockchain means there’s a built-in transaction record… anybody with a little bit of experience in reading the ledger could just track everything.

      Other than that you’re absolutely right.

      1. Cryptocurrencies are still largely unregulated, and the crypto market has attracted exactly the kind of people you would expect to be most interested in unregulated financial transactions - scammers, thieves, con men, ransomware gangs, money launderers, and anyone who wants buy or sell CSAM, narcotics, weapons, DDOS-as-a-Service, and North Korea’s government funding crew. The crypto market is absolutely chock-full of criminal activity, so it’s entirely reasonable to assume that anyone who wants to participate in that market wants to participate in the crime.
      2. As you said, trading physical gold for digital currency is a stupid idea. It’s also uneccessary, because the FBI is already sitting on a collection of cryptocurrencies that have been confiscated through criminal investigations, including large amounts of Bitcoin. It is technically illegal right now for the US government to do anything with that, but that could be changed with a law. There’s nowhere else for that cryptocurrency to go anyway.

      It seems likely to me that a play to distribute gold from the reserve is about having an excuse to open it and take gold out, and disappear some of it in the process. It’s a cover for a plan to rob the US.

    • datendefekt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 days ago

      Bitcoin absolutely is traceable. Addresses might not be clear names, but all transactions are public. Which makes me wonder why the government wants to use Bitcoin.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Because the crypto currency industry spent an absolutely ungodly amount of money helping Trump get elected.

        The government buying and holding Bitcoin pumps up the price of Bitcoin. This is just the other side of the quid pro quo. They got him elected, now he has to make them richer.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s correct. Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. If you can find the identity of a party to any bitcoin transaction, you then can know about every transaction they ever made with that ID.

        Which makes me wonder why the government wants to use Bitcoin.

        Because Trump is a fucking imbecile, but thinks there’s an opportunity for a scam.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      untraceable

      Literally every transaction is stored in a public ledger that anyone can read. That’s not exactly untraceable. Eventually someone will convert the Bitcoin to regular currency, which then links the transaction chain to the real world. Transactions can be clustered based on accounts at exchanges, and often patterns emerge once you do this. This is how some ransomware groups are uncovered.

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      If your problem with Bitcoin is that it’s a made up currency then I have vers bad news about gold for you.

      And all other currencies.

      That plan is ludicrous for a lot of reasons but you chose to mention the only two that are not it

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      limited resource

      Gold can be created in supernovae and then found in asteroids.

      There will only be 21 million bitcoins ever.

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    This reality is so fucking stupid. Let’s sell something of value to buy something that is only valuable if someone really wants it bad enough.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      To be fair, gold is the same. It’s just more well established since it’s been around much longer.

      Not defending this shit, just pointing out that gold is also only worth what people are willing to pay for it. That’s kind of how all markets work.

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Gold works without energy. It doesnt oxidise or decay as other materials

        • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Seriously when people say gold is worthless, what a joke. There is very little of it, as you mentioned it doesn’t oxidize, it’s the metal used in microchips. It ain’t sea shells or tulip bulbs or Bitcoin, that’s for sure.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Did I say it was worthless? It’s worth whatever people are willing to pay for it for its industrial purposes. That’s it.

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            I would agree for the case that we’re truly in end times where nobody has anything and people fight over scraps of food, that gold might be worthless.

            It’s still your best bet for all other scenarios that don’t involve you hiding in a cave and eating bugs.

            • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              8 days ago

              And even THEN, gold is a shiny, pretty metal that doesn’t oxidize like other shiny metals. So the tyrants of the apocalyptic wastelands will STILL want it for jewelry.

              • vxx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                I think that’s the moment you don’t want to have Gold on you.

              • vxx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I think the end times is the short period before the end.

                If it is sudden, gold does matter even less.

          • SilverCode@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            With a bar of gold you can crush someone’s skull in and steal their food. Try do that with Bitcoin.

          • BussyCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 days ago

            If all society broke down and all currencies became worthless gold would still have value as it has intrinsic value due to its chemical properties. Bitcoin would be worth nothing

            • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 days ago

              There are easier and cheaper means of exchange. Indigenous people all over the world had access to gold but used it for decoration and not trade.

              • BussyCat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Gold is pretty damn “cheap” to use as a currency it’s a softer metal with a lower melting point which allows it to be easily minted and then since its properties are somewhat unique it makes it harder to counterfeit without more complex technology. It is also rare enough that small bits of it can be used for currency so you don’t have to use something like the giant stone discs of yap. Some places used food for currency like rice or cocoa beans but those had too little value per unit of currency which made them annoying.

                • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I really suggest you read Graeber’s “Debt” to get a more complete picture of how economies can work. It’s not all giant stone discs.

                  Plus there’s tons of ways gold can be adulterated. Devaluing gold currency is incredibly easy, as is shaving or sweating the coins to get your own gold.

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The difference is gold has carried high monetary value among human societies for nearly 3000 years while Bitcoin is a non tangible digital asset that’s existed for less than two decades and remains incredibly volatile.

        This comes across as another Trump scam. He’s going to bankrupt the American government by siphoning public money to himself and other private entities and the American people are going to be stuck hodling the bag.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          That, and gold actually has properties that make it useful, like not oxidizing and being a good conductor. It still has value even if it was otherwise worthless as a currency

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            If bitcoin was otherwise worthless as a currency, then it would still be useful for secure time stamps.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Because then people would have to admit that bitcoin isn’t crypto, and PoS consumes something like 99.9% less power than PoW.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Because we’re talking about value by itself, outside of money. So HashCash for emails is useful even if there’s no money involved, but locking up a dozen Stanley Nickels doesn’t cost anything.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    So… I’m guessing the plebs get the cryptocurrencies. Which are backed by stablecoins… which are backed by tech grifters saying “I can cover it bro, trust me”.

    Meanwhile the elites will take all that worthless gold and dispose of it for us.

    • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Bitcoin is backed by the price of coal.

      For all intents and purposes, bitcoin is effectively minted coal.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Bitcoin doesn’t relate to coal that’s still unburnt. It’s more a certificate confirming a quantum of environmental destruction.

        • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          That’s probably a better way to put it yeah.

          And as fucked as it is, it is a fact that this does hold value and is backed by it.

          It’s just a pretty shit thing to be backed by ethically.

          But nonetheless, there is value in bitcoin, it’s just best we don’t encourage further investment in such a thing.

        • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yep. It’s unethical but nonetheless makes the coin actually have tangible holdings, because it’s actually impacting the real world.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        yes but remember it artifically inflates so the amount of coal its worth is always going higher. You need way more coal to make one down than you did ten years ago.

  • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Mr. Art of the deal-do is robbing you blind. No matter how this ends, he and felon will have stashed piles of you cash

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      The only real question is whether he is doing this to enrich himself, or because Putin told him to do it.

  • CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Well there it is. For anyone who believed that they were simply going to create a reserve to store already existing cryptocurrencies - that were confiscated by the federal agencies - and not spend federal dollars to bolster or hype up cryptocurrencies that are connected to the people in the administration, y’all are idiots.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean even that original plan would be fairly stupid. Law enforcement agencies seem to operate just fine with the current reserve of forfeited cryptocoins - I didn’t read anywhere of the FBI/CIA/etc crying out for a central bank style ‘strategic reserve’ managed by the FRB to add more layers of bureaucracy.

      The only place I can find in news cycles saying it’s a great idea is a think tank entitled the Bitcoin Policy Institute who put out a report in late 2024 entitled “The case for Bitcoin as a reserve asset”. Plus all the usual crypto bros begging for it to pump their positions. Gosh, I wonder if these parties may be biased.