Personally I kinda liked the first season. It’s better if you forget the original Asimov story and just watch it as its own thing because it diverges from it quite a bit.

Season 2 Full Trailer - Youtube

Looking forward to see where they go after that ballsy season 1 ending. Lee Pace will continue to kill it no doubt.

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really tried, but I definitely gave up on S01 when I burst into laughter during the scene where the people find the commander of the crashed ship crawling away. Good grief.

    So much of that show is like written by a 6yo. Or a very primitive AI.

    Oh and relation to Foundation? Zero. I believe the first few books are difficult to adapt, but not even try?

    • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell, I was on the fence by that point, but when the teacher-student romance BS setup was nauseatingly obvious — and then they actually opened with it the very next episode?! FFS. What is this, Outlander-in-space? Ge’ tae fucc.

  • stravanasu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately I didn’t enjoy the 1st season, just like other commenters here. A preliminary reason could be that the story is very different from the book, which is one of my most favourite sci-fi books ever. But even simply seeing this series as something different from the book, if found it too cheap: the characters are half-stereotypes, the events are what you’d expect, usual blood and sex to attract viewers…

    Should go without saying, just my personal opinion and tastes. I’m happy that others enjoyed the series and I hope it’ll made them curious to read the books.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only parts of the show I enjoyed was the segments about the Emperor(s), which was a completely new invention of the show. It felt like somehow the writing A-team had snuck off to make some kind of weird original scifi thing, while the B-team was writing the “main” Foundation centered plot.

      Putting aside any love for the books, I found the Foundation sections to be bad on their own terms. I stopped watching when the gang did a Call Of Duty mission into a ghost ship.

    • JasSmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also loved the books and I think this might be the difference. It’s only very loosely based on the books. Those who seem to enjoy the show often haven’t read the books at all, or don’t have much of a connection with them.

      I just wish Hollywood would stop butchering such amazing IP. They should create new IP if they have such disdain for the original content.

  • hoges25@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll wait to see feedback before watching season 2. The empire storyline was fantastic, the scenery incredible and adding diversity and changing genders absolutely needed to happen to make it work for tv. But the whole magic thing, everyone being special and dull storylines killed it. The whole point of Mayor Hardin was that “violence is the last refuge of the incompetent”. So for tv they decide to have her wield a gun for nearly every scene and when that doesn’t work it isn’t intelligence that gets her through its magic precognition. They even reference the quote specifically as if to mock anyone who has read the book.

    So instead of having a strong, intelligent, nuanced female lead that would have been incredible viewing (particularly given current events with Ukraine and how intelligence can overcome violence), we have a dull, monotone magician who gets by on girl and gun power. The character and actor deserved so much more than what was delivered.

    • 15liam20@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found that there were two stories, one with with emporers which was really compelling and another story with the Foundation which was really dull which is why I give it an overall rating of 5/10

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        When Alexander Siddig (Dr. Bashir) showed up for like five minutes I was like “Wait no! Don’t go!” as his scene was ending.

      • Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually get the feeling this started out as a totally different series about an empire of clone rulers existing over millennia, and they struggled to sell it so they reworked it into a hodgepodge adaptation of bits from every major asimoverse book combined and time-shifted into one series.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get that feeling a lot. Season 1 of Star Trek Picard makes way more sense if you think it started out as some kind of Blade Runner fan fiction that was clumsily smashed into Star Trek.

  • JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t believe how bad season 1 is. The only reason I didn’t stop watching was the emperor story line. Lee Pace killed it. Most of the actors are TERRIBLE. It was like watching wooden planks act. Instead of developing the story in any meaningful way, the directors chose to focus on disparate and dream-like sequences which appear to have little connection to each other.

    This is science fiction of the worst kind. The source material is absolutely butchered. The dialogue is atrocious. The CGI is laughable. The accents are ridiculous. I don’t know how I made it through the first season. What an absolute joke.

  • zefiax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ya it was student from the books but I think the changes were necessary. In the books, we get a whole new set of characters every 30 pages or so. It wouldn’t work for tv where shows are often character driven. As someone who lives the books, I enjoyed the show adaptation and the changes made.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have to admit I didn’t enjoy the first series and didn’t finish it. I found the series overwritten with a convoluted plot, and barely recognisable as an adaptation of the book series.

    I’m also not a fan of a series that turns books that are grounded in science and believability into a story featuring people with magic abilities like precognition and magic powers. It rather misses the whole point of the books, and just felt silly.

    Having said that I’m going to rewatch it and try and finish it, hoping I’ve misjudged it.

    • koreth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m also not a fan of a series that turns books that are grounded in science and believability into a story featuring people with magic abilities like precognition and magic powers.

      For me, the “grounded in science” ship had already sailed by the end of the original trilogy, when

      book spoilers

      the Second Foundation was revealed to be a shadowy group of mind-manipulating telepaths.

      • stravanasu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I partly agree with your comment about the books. But there’s a curious historical element to consider: at that time telepathy was really discussed in the mainstream scientific literature as a scientific possibility. Not in a crackpot way, but in a scientific way: theories were developed, tests and experiments made, and then it was concluded that it doesn’t exist, with explanations about why.

        Since it was a scientific possibility at that time, or at least it wasn’t seen as crackpottery, it was obviously used in science-based sci-fi books (not only Asimov’s).

        It’s a little like they do in today’s sci-fi with “parallel universes” or “quantum theory & consciousness” and similar stuff, which is discussed in today’s scientific literature. Maybe (or very probably, in my opinion) in 50 or 100 years they’ll laugh their arses off looking at our “science-based” sci-fi of today.

  • Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve read the whole series and absolutely love it, but I know that a direct adaptation would have been a failure.

    I really enjoyed S1, they’ve taken some ideas from other Asimov universe series (Empire and Robots) and combined it into a pretty fascinating alternate take on the foundation universe.

    It’s visually stunning, has some great acting and direction and I’m really looking forward to S2

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Aaand here’s episode 3, it’s 200 years later and all the characters you saw before are dead. Moving on!”

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s just as much a problem when reading the books. But the problem is that a TV show must succeed with a popular audience, whereas a book can please a niche audience.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Big-budget shows must succeed with a popular audience.

            One of the nice things about the rapid improvements in special effects technology and AI is that I’m hoping smaller indy studios will start making more shows that are aimed at those niches. If you haven’t spent a lot to make the show you can afford to appeal to a much smaller audience.

            • CorrosiveCapital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              More likely that the lives of vfx workers just continue to get less financially stable while having to have more skillets to cover more disciplines at once while “ai” is suppose to make up the difference according to their corporate overlords.

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure. But any TV show is big-budget compared to what it takes to produce a book. Books will always have more ability to cater to a weird little niche. Another reason to read more.