AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up11.19Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1external-linkAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldAMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squareInternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41arrow-down1·4 days agoRobot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
minus-squareIoughttamow@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up28·4 days agoUnder the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoGood start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 days agoA truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
minus-squareBlack616Angel@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoOkay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.
Robot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
Under the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
Ohhh yes
Good start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
A truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
Okay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.