• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Rather than Gemini, we should make some kind of web site certification for no cookies, no JavaScript, and no external images. Maybe have a browser plugin that gives a checkmark on the tab when you’re on a complying site.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      The argument for the lack of it is that pixel trackers could be used to break privacy.

      This shows that the Gemini devs didn’t know what they were doing. You can track people by parsing your server logs if you want. You don’t need a pixel tracker to do that. Limiting images to local server links only would have done the job.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Thats not the only argument against inline images:

        4.4.3 Why doesn’t text/gemini support inline images?

        This is a deliberate decision made in direct service of the guiding principle of user autonomy (see answer 4.2.2), specifically the idea that text/gemini documents should have no way to trigger additional network requests. Images are one particular case where this principle also overlaps substantially with our guiding principle of user privacy (see answer 4.2.1). So-called “tracking-pixels” have been a standard tool of the internet’s surveillance marketing complex for many years. These tiny, invisible images abuse the web’s behaviour of automatically downloading image files from arbitrary third-party servers to effectively trick your computer into “pinging” surveillance servers, reporting your movements as you explore the web.

        gemini://geminiprotocol.net/docs/faq-section-4.gmi

        • P4ulin_KbanaOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          I still believe that sacrifing images completely is a terrible idea.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            I mean, you can have external images, and its then the job of the browser how to display them; be it inline, in a new tab, replacing the page etc.

  • 56!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s just that the user is in control of page styling.

    • P4ulin_KbanaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      By personal taste, I would prefer that every page has its own custom look instead of making it the same. Gives more personality. They could at least create some sort of reduced CSS and make it optional to load. If I wanted to see a simple page, I would rather read a book.

      ⚠️ This is just my personal opinion, you are free to respectfully disagree with it. ⚠️