• UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    People should be free to vote for who best represents them while still counting their vote if their preference didn’t win.

    Passing state level electoral reform will not only empower the creation of stronger 3rd parties, but also force the legacy political parties to have to compete and actually represent people.

    No more safe seats, no more hostage situation, no more voting while holding our noses, only democracy. More democracy was always going to be the solution to this problem. Who could possibly be against more democracy?

    Videos on Electoral Reform

    First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

    Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

    STAR voting

    Alternative vote

    Ranked Choice voting

    Range Voting

    Single Transferable Vote

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      While I agree that first past the post is the worst possible option, we need national reform as well.

      STAR or RCV has the potential to break the 2 party system where votes are counted, but it comes up short against the electoral college system. As long as the electoral college is how we choose our President we will only have 2 viable candidates and the parties will have elevated power to not only choose our candidates but to elevate their preferred down ballot candidates which hobbles alternative voting mechanisms.

      The electoral college combined with citizens United gives the parties practically unchecked power.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        National reform will only happen from the bottom up. Need to change the local elections first and push every incumbent out of their seats. The current people in power will never cede.