Brasil
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 months ago

Cheese-loving gommunists owned

hexbear.net

external-link
message-square
30
link
fedilink
202
external-link

Cheese-loving gommunists owned

hexbear.net

RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 months ago
message-square
30
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    5 months ago

    why be a landlord at this point?

    Excellent question. Why indeed? mao-aggro-shining

  • GladimirLenin [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    5 months ago

    The fuck is a social housing landlord? Isn’t the whole point of social housing that it’s not owned by some fucking piece of shit landlord?

    • Gorb [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thatcher social housing snatcher. It all got sold off and now its privatised and the state spend gorillions giving money to landlords

      • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Lmao wtf, the UKkk is surely THE neoliberal hell on earth

        • Gorb [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It very much is. Anyway worth looking up post war consensus and right to buy if you’re interested in what we had and lost within the span of like 40 years.

          Or this very good Tom Nicholas video https://youtu.be/jZpLiJdIGbs

          • HexReplyBot [none/use name]@hexbear.netB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

            • yewtu.be
            • inv.nadeko.net
            • yt.artemislena.eu
            • piped.video
        • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          the germans did this, except in some cases after the buildings were basically collapsing because the profit has been squeezed out of it they bought them back, renovated them, then sold them again

      • GladimirLenin [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        5 months ago

        No. Fucking. Way. That is absurd. UK labor is fucking worthless. What a ridiculously easy issue to campaign on.

        • Lemister [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          deleted by creator

    • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 months ago

      if you are a landlord (parasitic filth) you can register with a regulator or the local council to offer the property as social housing
      generally they are supposed to be held to certain standards and be inspected etc.
      but pretty much every council has a waiting list ~5-10 years long because thatcher sold a shitload off, so they usually fast track them through, so the tenant gets miserable and sick, and the slumlord gets rich

      • TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        because thatcher sold a shitload off

        Also because the UK forgot how to build anything that’s not a giant glass dildo for investment banks around 1980

      • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        At least in my county, the council doesn’t really interact with or take responsibility for social housing. It was solely that social housing was offered to low-income families and that it’s supposed to be charged at 75% market rate.

        In fairness, most social housing is owned by supposedly not-for-profit organisations, but they’re still typically making rich people rich and screwing over poor people.

    • RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      Haha no, let’s have a parasitic middle man otherwise is gommunism and “inneficient”, and let’s also do that with hospitals, ports, railroads etc

      • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        But look on the bright side, we don’t have to pay the scary T-WORD (subsidizing businesses is different, trust me.)

    • Lemister [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • GoodGuyWithACat [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      The US pretty much has the same thing with Section 8 housing and it’s also poorly maintained.

  • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 months ago

    why be a landlord at this point?

    What do they mean? Everytime a la dlord posts or talks its about how hard they work to maintain their property. Constantly fixing things and dealing with unreasonable tenants. Such upstanding citizens surely would fix mould, wether or not the law required it, right? Then there’s no practical change.
    The only way this could be bad, is if landlords don’t actually do anything

    • Chump [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s worse. Even the ones who would fix it on their own will get up in arms about being made to. If they do it on their own, they can feel good about themselves; if they have to do it, they don’t get that sense of moral superiority

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      the mould is obviously from unreasonable tenants just hosing down the walls all the time. it’s like the zoolander gas station scene in there, 24/7. So it’s bad you have to fix that because it removes the serfs incentive to not do the zoolander gas station scene 24/7

  • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    5 months ago

    A landlord: I actually have to do something? negative

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    ukkk: “Sorry, but this product you’re selling can’t be dangerous.”

    porky-scared-flipped: “UGH, you’re KIIILLING MEEEEEEE! What are we, a bunch of BROWNS?!?!?”

    What a baby.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Not enough, clearly landlord-spotted

  • blame [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sounds like ukkk could stand to have a few more laws on landlords if cleaning up mould is a problem.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      And remember: the working class is obviously the lazier class.

      • 𝕮𝕬𝕭𝕭𝕬𝕲𝕰@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Didn’t you hear? Being a landlord is a working class occupation.

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    why be a landlord at this point?

    If they don’t want to be landlords any more they can give their speculative real estate to the people who live in it and get real jobs instead of being landlords.

    For some reason they never do that, even though being a landlord is so horrible.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Bare in mind that most of these properties will sell for a profit even with mould and shit dripping off the window sills. These people act like theyre trapped into their wildly appreciating assets.

      I viewed a house last week that stank of mould and damp, looked like absolute shit and even the estate agents said it would need someone to strip the walls and treat it (like £2000+) but they still had it accepted for asking price which was a healthy £50,000 profit over 2019.

  • 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    What’s the maw equivalent of

  • sweatersocialist [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s not even landlords lmfao this is for social housing AKA councils and housing associations providing rent fixed to your income. Private Landlords can still mould it up however they like.

    (ok technically social housing can have landlords but still it’s such a small share of the UK housing market that it won’t meaningfully harm the average mom-and-pop landleech)

  • GenderIsOpSec [she/her, kit/kit's]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hate on ladlords aside, the comment can be interpreted as extremely ableist

      • GenderIsOpSec [she/her, kit/kit's]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        yeah i know negative

  • eyyImwalkin [none/use name]@hexbear.netBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    but who else is gonna LORD THE LAND!!!1eleven

traingang@hexbear.net

urbanism@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !urbanism@hexbear.net

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post “lmao” or use the tired “_____ challenge” format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

“that train pic is too powerful lmao” - u/Cadende

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 66 users / day
  • 195 users / week
  • 430 users / month
  • 1.88K users / 6 months
  • 5 local subscribers
  • 22.9K subscribers
  • 805 Posts
  • 5.79K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • ZoomeristLeninist [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org