• MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    We have things that other people who may or may not have known Aristotle claim Aristotle wrote. If you believe Aristotle and Plato were real people then you should accept that Jesus was based on somebody even if the message he was spreading isn’t the same as the faith maintains now.

    Why not try reading the link rather than expounding upon a false understanding? For example the earliest writings are from around 70CE which is 37-40 years later. You shoildn’t be making any claims when you are making mistakes this simple because you clearly aren’t coming from an educated perspective.

    I’m not saying Jesus Christ in the Bible is a historical figure. I am saying there was a real human being that was a basis for the faith.

    And again all of this is based on what actual academic historians maintain not religious figures. What is your take based upon other than conjecture?

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We have things that other people who may or may not have known Aristotle claim Aristotle wrote.

      We have many things, written right about the same time, all making the same claims, about what Artistotle wrote.

      We do not have congruent, contemporary writings about Jesus/Yeshua.

      Why not try reading the link rather than expounding upon a false understanding?

      I did. And there is not evidence of his existence, as your link stated. Does that mean Yeshua, the individual, did not exist? No. But, it’s also not on us to prove he did not exist! That’s impossible (Proving a negative).

      What we can say: There is no evidence he existed, even in places it should exist. And, exceptional claims (Such as a virgin birth, son of god, major political decisions) require exceptional evidence.

      You cannot prove there isn’t a teapot orbiting the sun, either. However, we can safely assume there is not, until such evidence has been found to support said claim.

      For example the earliest writings are from around 70CE which is 37-40 years later.

      Fine. The closest writings are from 40 years late. One full generation. Did the prior generation not think to write ANYTHING about this guy? Not even a Roman notice somewhere? A proclamation of all male children being executed? NOTHING. Until 40 years after the claimed event.

      • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Where do you think this evidence should exist? Do you think the Jews and Romans kept birth records for the equivalent of working class people?

        Again Im not claiming there was a messiah. Im not claiming miracles were real so put own that straw bale you keep returning to.

        Ok and how do you think thousands of people all separated by massive distances all arrive on the same name and basic stories if they weren’t based on a single guy?

        Why would you think Rome has records of random people? We cannot prove the existence of almost anyone from Rome that way other than the extremely wealthy and influential.

        Do you have any actual historical education beyond secondary school? You don’t seem to

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Where do you think this evidence should exist?

          Well, to start… Contemporary accounts.

          Do you think the Jews and Romans kept birth records for the equivalent of working class people?

          Its literally claimed that Yeshua was subject to a census, performed by Romans, who were meticulous in their record keeping. We have no record of a census, period.

          Or, even decrees by Pilate ordering his execution.

          Or even, just, news of some radical with his name, causing trouble. NOTHING.

          What we have are accounts from 40-100 years later, making bold claims. Much like we have similar sets of evidence for the existence of a man named Hercules who was a demigod as well.

          Again Im not claiming there was a messiah. Im not claiming miracles were real so put own that straw bale you keep returning to.

          You are, however, expecting us to believe something with no evidence.

          Ok and how do you think thousands of people all separated by massive distances all arrive on the same name and basic stories if they weren’t based on a single guy?

          Same way all mythology forms. Tall tales told, and retold.

          Why would you think Rome has records of random people?

          This isn’t “random people”… This is a person, who was so hated by his own community,they demanded a Roman governor try, and execute him. And Roman’s kept pretty detailed records about this sort of stuff.

          SOMETHING would have survived. Nothing survived, or more likely, never existed.

          Do you have any actual historical education beyond secondary school? You don’t seem to

          Yes, I actually do, thanks. And none of the mythology should be taken any more serious than any other mythology we study.