• Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That’s not relevant to the argument about how they could be dangerous for national security.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I wouldn’t be so sure about that. The CEO has a prominent seat at Trump’s inauguration.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yep. Which means TikTok gave Thumper a load of dough and TikTok will be allowed to continue operating here. Zuck is probably not happy since he’d also given him a load of dough to get rid of TikTok.

        pops corn

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Except when he wanted it banned during his first term and up until very, very recently when he flip flopped to loving it.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        He wanted to ban it until he thought it helped him with the youth. So no. You are incorrect.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Clearly that user has trouble keeping up with our multiple reality spacetime logic to forget stances Trump supposedly held concurrent with contradictory stances he supposedly holds currently as well as absurd stances he supposedly will hold in the infinite futures.