BYD Brazil scandal exposes flaws in Chinese investment – DW – 01/08/2025
www.dw.com
"Slavery-like" working conditions have been uncovered at the Chinese EV maker's factory site in Brazil, casting a spotlight on the standards maintained by Chinese companies outsourcing workers at foreign locations.

Summary

Brazilian authorities uncovered “slavery-like” conditions at BYD’s factory construction site in Bahia, rescuing 163 Chinese workers subjected to withheld passports, withheld wages, and unsanitary conditions.

The site, managed by contractor Jinjiang Group, was shut down, and BYD faces scrutiny despite its promises to cooperate.

The case highlights tensions between Chinese investment and local labor standards, sparking debates in Brazil and China over worker rights.

Experts see this as an example for Chinese investors to respect Brazil’s independent judiciary while noting it won’t deter future Chinese investments.

        • rah@feddit.ukEnglish
          15·
          8 hours ago

          looks like

          To you. Maybe re-read what I’ve written.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
            3·
            8 hours ago

            Okay.

            You say that as if Western nations aren’t themselves brutal, oppressive and exploitative.

            Still looks like “What about the Western nations? No one is completely blameless.” To me.

            • rah@feddit.ukEnglish
              11·
              8 hours ago

              “What about the Western nations? No one is completely blameless.”

              That would only make sense if I had introduced the concept of Western nations. OP did that, not me.

              Maybe re-read not just what I wrote, but the whole thread.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
                11·
                7 hours ago

                Okay, I’ve re-read the thread.

                It still looks like you’re both engaging in whataboutism to me. You still haven’t explained how this is not implying that no one is completely blameless, making the argument invalid.

                • rah@feddit.ukEnglish
                  1·
                  5 hours ago

                  It still looks like you’re both engaging in whataboutism to me.

                  shrug

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason ?

                  You still haven’t explained how this is not implying that …

                  It’s not on me to show that what I’ve said is not something you think it is, it’s on you to show that what I’ve said is something you think it is.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
                    11·
                    5 hours ago

                    You’re denying you’re engaging in whataboutism, so yes it is on you. You have made a claim now.