Summary

Brazilian authorities uncovered “slavery-like” conditions at BYD’s factory construction site in Bahia, rescuing 163 Chinese workers subjected to withheld passports, withheld wages, and unsanitary conditions.

The site, managed by contractor Jinjiang Group, was shut down, and BYD faces scrutiny despite its promises to cooperate.

The case highlights tensions between Chinese investment and local labor standards, sparking debates in Brazil and China over worker rights.

Experts see this as an example for Chinese investors to respect Brazil’s independent judiciary while noting it won’t deter future Chinese investments.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        looks like

        To you. Maybe re-read what I’ve written.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Okay.

          You say that as if Western nations aren’t themselves brutal, oppressive and exploitative.

          Still looks like “What about the Western nations? No one is completely blameless.” To me.

          • rah@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            “What about the Western nations? No one is completely blameless.”

            That would only make sense if I had introduced the concept of Western nations. OP did that, not me.

            Maybe re-read not just what I wrote, but the whole thread.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Okay, I’ve re-read the thread.

              It still looks like you’re both engaging in whataboutism to me. You still haven’t explained how this is not implying that no one is completely blameless, making the argument invalid.

              • rah@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                It still looks like you’re both engaging in whataboutism to me.

                shrug

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason ?

                You still haven’t explained how this is not implying that …

                It’s not on me to show that what I’ve said is not something you think it is, it’s on you to show that what I’ve said is something you think it is.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  You’re denying you’re engaging in whataboutism, so yes it is on you. You have made a claim now.

                  • rah@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    You have made a claim now.

                    It’s you who made the claim that I am engaging in “whataboutism”. It’s on you to show that what you’ve said is true.