What evolutional benefit is that?

  • driving_crooner
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    1 year ago

    People think of evolution as it’s needed straight A+ to pass, when C is enough.

    • dreadgoat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also what’s the definition of “passing?” The dinos we are talking about are extinct, they didn’t “pass” for long. A+ creatures things like alligators, ants, and crabs. On average a given species survives around a million years before going extinct. How long do you have to exist before you’re considered a successful species?

      • eyvind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        T. rex was around for 20 million years or so, I’d say they passed for long enough to be considered successful. Despite the tiny arms.

      • winky88@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        100+ million years qualifies as right in the middle of “for long” in my book. The fact that an asteroid or comet of biblical proportions wiped them out has nothing to do with evolutionary effectiveness. Most of the animals that did survive either A) lived in water or B) lived underground.

      • girl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think science really categorizes species based on how successful they were. “Passing” in this sense refers to the individuals in the species who were able to reproduce, not the population as a whole. Most dinosaurs “passed” until ecological conditions killed them off, they didn’t die because they failed to adapt. A lot of the species that survived mass extinction events were just lucky, rather than having some ideal set of characteristics that allowed them to survive.

        • dreadgoat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree that most species surviving mass extinction events were just lucky, but I think that also says something special about the ones that survived MULTIPLE events (ants), or those that effectively re evolved into existence after extinction events (crabs)