

- harden sshd
- use fail2ban or even better
CrowdStrikeCrowdSec - use a tool like the following to have a next-gen security solution: https://github.com/mrash/fwknop
“None of this is in any way normal,” Matthew Green.
Exactly, Matthew. But they are normal in a fascist country. Remember, if you do not fight actively against it, you are part of it. Too many former Nazis came up with the excuse “But I was forced to” or “I didn’t know any of this”. Non of those arguments are valid. Fight against it. Leave the country. But giving interviews will not change it.
Things like that make me so unbelievably angry. No caring parent would actually allow this, let alone do it themselves.
I have to keep telling me now, that this babyboy will not remember this event, or else I would start hunting those people down.
Worms.
What’s up, buddy? Why the sudden silence? Or did you finally realize that “Signal security failure” was never something someone said and it was actually just something the author came up with?
That’s right. It is just unnecessary to mention Signal at all in this case, as it might cause confusion.
All good. It’s just an unnecessary punch against Signal. Especially journalist rely heavily on it, so I don’t know what the intention was with this title.
And where exactly do you see “Signal security failure” in the quoted text?
Sure sure. Oh. About the quotes. Do you mind sharing a screenshot of the quotes you are talking about?
Tell me you are dense, without telling me you are dense. You can’t make this shit up 🤣
Came here to say this. The display has a resolution of 2880 x 1800 pixels. And this “journalist” tells me, that it looks good with a configured resolution of 1920 x 1080. Tells a lot about the quality of this review.
There are no quotes. So it is not something Trump said. It was interpreted by the author of the news story.
Have my upvote. Because my view is the same. The title included a quote, which is even marked as a quote. However, “Signal security failure” is without quotes. So the author just chose to unnecessarily blame Signal, instead of the real issue.
Disagree. Wir lieben das Einschlafen. Das schlafen selbst nehmen wir leider nicht wahr. Das Aufwachen ist dann meist die Hölle.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Well, theoretically, an organism is nothing but a system running fully automatically. So I can see the possibility to have it fixed by another system. In the meantime, AI should support doctors, by making the invisible visible.
Let’s say we have a group of 10 people. 7 with cancer, 3 without.
If the AI detects cancer in 6 out of the 7, that’s a success of 86%.
If the AI detects cancer in 2 of the 3 healthy people, that’s a success of 100%.
So, operating the healthy ones always leads to a success and AI is trained by success. That’s why a human should look at the scans too, for now.
Fml… yes, I meant CrowdSec. Thanks for the hint