• 1 Post
  • 162 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 30th, 2023

help-circle


  • No what I said is that them being idiots doesn’t excuse you being an idiot as well.

    If public enemy number 1 in a banana republic gets 98% of the votes and people state the people’s favorite actually won (implying voter fraud), you’re saying the people’s favorite can’t run again because people stated he won?

    That is your logic right there. And you don’t evaluate your stupidity because Trump is an incredibly easy target so nothing you say should be scrutinized. I think that’s stupid and detrimental and you should hold yourself to a better standard instead of simply throwing out silly statements aimed at easy targets.



  • Mate if you don’t know that there’s a difference between him winning and someone stating “everyone knows he won” then I would be careful questioning what people know.

    What would be the point of saying “everyone knows he won” when he’d actually became the president? It makes no sense. You should learn to read between the lines, which says “he had more votes so he should’ve been the president”. And before you go off again about the popular vote you should realize that what I know about how elections function has no effect on the lack of logic from the guy owning the truck.

    You’re so eager to make the other side look bad, which they do a pretty good job of by themselves, that you’re no longer critical of what you’re saying.




  • It’s just a tighter grouping of (biased) data that can be searched and retrieved a bit quicker.

    How is your intelligence different from being “biased data that can be accessed”?

    The fact that something can reason about what it presents to you as information is a form of intelligence. And while this discussion is impossible without defining “reason”, I think we should at least agree that when a machine can explain to you what and why it did what it did, it is a form of reason.

    Should we also not define what it means when a person answers a question through reasoning? It’s easy to overestimate the complexity of it because of our personal bias and our ability to fantasize about endless possibilities, but if you break our abilities down, they might be the result of nothing but a large dataset combined with a simple algorithm.

    It’s easy to handwave the intelligence of an AI, not because it isn’t intelligent, but because it has no desires, and therefore doesn’t act unless acted upon. It is not easy to jive that concept with the idea that something is alive, which is what we generally require before calling it intelligent.


  • smooth_tea@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzBurning Up
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    You’re missing the point. The issue with Fahrenheit is not about the conversion from Celsius, most Europeans don’t need to do that anyway. The problem is Fahrenheit in itself, it’s just not elegant or scientific and therefore comes off as arbitrary and only makes sense when you grow up with it.




  • smooth_tea@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldOffended
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    So, you’ve talked to a few people, and now group a is better than group b?

    Not only is it a ridiculous implication, but you’re somehow grouping up the beforementioned as if they’re not all individuals, who no doubt each have the capability to be extremely annoying.

    You then juxtapose this against the right wing/constitutionalists, but why? Why does everything devolve into left vs right? You think all the gay and trans people are automatically left leaning? You’re invalidating the existence of quite a few people just to make a bad argument.




  • smooth_tea@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzMSc Mansplaining
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    I don’t think it’s funny, because the joke is illogical. If he is a teacher in a University, and it looks like it, that it is his job to mansplain.

    So close. You seem to have Sheldon levels of understanding sarcasm.

    It’s just a simple joke about the term being misapplied to an everyday setting.



  • It’s actually the IDF that uses Palestinians as human shields and routinely kidnaps kids and tortures them. WHICH THEY DO.

    The use of Palestinians as human shields by Israeli Defense Forces has been documented by human rights organizations including Human Rights Watch, B’Tselem and Amnesty International.[6][7][8] According to B’Tselem, IDF soldiers put Palestinian civilians in front of them or otherwise putting civilians in the line of fire,[9] and forcing Palestinians to remove suspicious objects (possible explosives).[9] IDF soldiers also force Palestinian civilians to walk through suspected booby-trapped buildings. Israel also formerly employed the “neighbor procedure” in which Palestinian civilians were forced to attempt to persuade wanted individuals to surrender themselves to the IDF.[10] The latter practice was defended by the Israeli defense ministry, but prohibited in 2005 by the Israeli Supreme Court,[11] though there have been accusations of its employment even after the ruling.[12][13] During the 2009 invasion of Gaza, IDF reportedly used Palestinian families (both adult and children) as human shields.[14][15]