enigmaticmandrill

I am French, so I am not going to answer to the last part about Keir Starmer, but I can help with your first question.

The executive branch of the French government is two-headed, with a President and a Prime Minister.

The President is the head of state, as such they are elected by universal suffrage, and are viewed as an arbitrator. The President is the commander in chief of the French military, and acts as the head of the French diplomacy.

The Prime Minister is the chief of the government. The PM is nominated by the President, to form a government or cabinet of several ministers. Together they are responsible, before the parliament, of implementing policies in the best interest of the nation. The parliament can revoke the PM and its government.

That’s where it gets messy :

if the parliament’s majority party is the presidential party, then the President can nominate a political ally as Prime Minister, and in practice, the center of gravity of the President-Prime Minister couple will move towards the president, who will be free to enact his policies.

However, if the majority party in the parliament is opposed to the President, then the President can only nominate a PM from the majority, otherwise the parliament will promptly revoke the PM. This situation is called a cohabitation, and it happened only 3 times under the 5th French republic. With a President and PM in opposition, the center of gravity is usually tilted towards the PM.

Now what happens when there is no clear majority party or coalition in the parliament? That has never happened before, not at the scale we are witnessing today. And there are no clear guidelines : presumably, the President will nominate a PM from the party that came out in the lead in these parliamentary election. But if all the other parties reject the new PM, they could oust them. A multi-party coalition could be created to reach the absolute majority, but lately the major political formations have been sternly opposed.

The coming days are going to be very interesting, and a good stress-test for our institutions.

Ni l’un ni l’autre : c’est un échantillonnage des votes déclarés à la sortie des bureaux de vote. À quelques dixièmes de pourcents prêt, c’est toujours fidèle au résultat final, qui ne sera connu que plus tard dans la nuit, quand tous les bureaux auront fini de compter les bulletins.

TL;DR

Two footballers went to a jewellers in Rome. They came in with their faces masked and shouted “Hands in the air! This is a stick up!”.

The jeweller shot one of them with a shotgun, who died minutes later. His last words were “It was just a joke…”

He left a wife and 2 kids.

Not all heroes wear capes! Thanks person!

It may be me being misinformed on the topic, bust most hacktivism actions I’ve heard about in the news were targeted at hurting the bad guys and rarely at effectively helping out the small guy.

In addition, the hackers used their access to the Russian prison system’s online commissary, where family members buy food for inmates, to change the prices of things like noodles and canned beef to one ruble, which is roughly $0.01

That’s surprisingly wholesome for hacktivists. Great idea!

The GOP will continue dragging out this investigation anyway, until they either find some actual dirt or create an artificial precedent that all presidents are under continuous investigation, thus discrediting any future impeachment procedure against their guy. Either way, It’s a win.

Hopefully the beginng of the end for Erdogan.

I would love this as well. How often do I stumble upon a news “article” that is just a headline and a video, with virtually no written content. I want to be able to read the news, at my own pace and without headphones!

Merci, j’ai déposé une alerte aussi!

I see an old woman.

:.|:;

It’s Henri, and we only had four of them. But we had 10 Charles.

Are you aware that Dailymotion, arguably Youtube’s most serious competitor, is a French company?

We did just what you suggested.

Now it’s time for internet giants to play by the rules (e.g., privacy-wise, tax-wise), or there will never be room for competition.

Don’t ban them, tax them.

This way smokers have to pay more so the demand will decrease, tobacco industry gets less money, and the economic burden on public health and environment can be financed with the additional tax income.

This reference makes me feel old.

I love it!

That’s cold… I had the same thought though.

Don’t be sorry. I assumed it was OC but did not really make any effort to check.