Nope. We good.
Nope. We good.
I like the new rules for forming Rome. It makes it a decent challenge and offer flexibility for when you just don’t want to conquer the Magreb of the Levant.
What’s your favorite starting nation to restore Rome in EU4 other than Byzantium?
Has there been a Bones/Bones crossover day yet?
I know I know. My boy Dio is toxic but I still love him anyways. It’s self cabbage-toge.
If Aurelian isn’t in your Top 5, swipe left.
No I will not elaborate further.
Trajan
Constantine
Diocletian
Aurelian
Justinian (if only Originals allowed then Augustus)
I always appreciated that the years of X emperor’s always increased. Imagine how confusing would it be to have the chaos years as 6,4,5 or 5,4,6.
If it makes you feel any better, that’s how I read the post too until you were corrected. I also missed the beginning sentence. Oops.
This may be the best Shampoo commercial I have ever seen.
I always thought the best part of the Tetrarchy was a legal foundation to the separation of East and West formalizing a constitutional division in the empire, which allowed the East to still have legitimacy after the West fell. That is it created the frame for a Rome without Rome.
I agree his retirement was, at the most generous, premature. It’s like he wanted to play Cincinnatus but the world wasn’t ready yet.
Edit: just better writing.
Sir, this is the Tavern of Wendy.
Pour one out for Sir Kitty, Knight of the Sofa, Protector of the Treats, Lord of the Snuggles!
I often find going to the tropics solves most of my problems!
In all seriousness, I totally agree that topical is the way to go.
From now on, this is how I assume one plays cricket.
It’s public domain so they don’t have to pay for the copyright of a modern translation.
This makes sense. Another theory is O’Brien’s character had a speech impediment related injury gained during whatever action won him his award.
To be fair, that man is 100 years old. His medicine cabinet must be briming with pills.
That looks more like an EU4 screenshot than a CK one.