when was this? u got anything fore to read on those? particularly on brazil since its my country and i had zero clue about that

crazy that if you go to any of their posts, ALL replies critiquing ICE are hidden by default. this is just twitter all over again

AI copy is so trashy

so like vibecoders!

why are they booing you, you’re right! it’s exactly that. LLMs are great for bulshitting confidently.

“With great power comes the absolute certainty that you’ll turn into a right cunt”

omg salviaposting on lemmy??!?!?

me too D:

unfortunately they boil the blood of a thousand newborns daily for avoiding this.

For example, one of the first vulnerabilities I found, that was used for the introduction hook in the 39c3 talk, remains unpatched to this day. Instead of being fixed with code, Werner Koch - the main developer of GnuPG - published a blog post declaring the widely-used feature being “harmful”; while they had weeks in advance, they published this on day one of 39c3, not even giving us time to respond.

what the actual fuck

i am in favour of them just doing this. the experience is a mess. affinity via wine worked much better for me.

(ps: maybe a rust rewrite? just kidding… unless… )

if it was that they would not be selling it!!

trying to apply capitalism ideas to foss surely will not go as planned for nazi boy

continue pls this is better than mr robot

cope for american AI corps is at an all time high

op is a repost bot btw

reading comprehension is indeed at an all time low lol

wtf??

whatever works for you! no need to do stuff just for the sake of it and its already great youre exploring nix

very weird they (1st linked repo) include Immich as having “AI functionality” and said functionality is face recognition and other features unrelated to LLMs

I wonder how much this sort of effort against AI is harming the contrarian vision of stopping it then helping, because we look stupid blindly hating anything to do with a neural network

the problem I have is the reductionist take that any project should be deemed ‘tainted’ if it has a permissive AI policy such as “use whatever you want but you’ll be banned if its slop”

there are great arguments against LLMs, as they are today, to not exist, which I strongly agree.

it doesn’t mean the best course of action is to target FOSS projects for tolerating its use, deeming them tainted for it, given they are not contributing to LLM’s existence. thinking WE, as users or developers of said projects, are perpetuating the cycle of abuse is shifting blame from the massive corporations actually pushing all of it.

it feels the same like with “carbon offset” ideas, where the concept of global warming is framed as “if only we do our part by buying from this carbon-neutral brand we will save everyone!” whereas the absolute majority of worldwide carbon emissions are from corporations and not individuals, and said framing only serves to mask that fact

AI should be regulated 'til oblivion, but can we not point fingers at each other and actually focus the discussion on the real pushers?? because saying that, for instance, Immich, an actually great project built by people for people, is “tainted” because LLM contribs are “ok” and has facial recognition is absolutely stupid because it deflects so hard from the actual people fucking us over