I admittedly didn’t read the article. Is that the reason or does someone already have an app called X? Either way they can just call it like “X - Formerly known as Twitter” but he’s probably too childish to do that.

There’s not a lot of reason to hate it if implemented correctly which it very well might not be at first and likely will cause some headaches. Regardless, Apple should also do a better job of telling users the reasons too if they are going to be doing this.

Right now, you fill out a whole bit of information about why your app might use specific private info, but Apple only shows minor information about it to the user. I’d much rather the user know the specific reason I’m using, for example, location instead of just for “App Functionality”. Would make a better user-developer relationship in my opinion and promote good transparency.

Sorry I’m not 100% sure about this, but is it possible to do it with Lemmy in the PWA? If so I’ll add it. Not able to look it up ATM though.

Shouldn’t it look like that?

But lol alright yea that’s bad. I’ll work on it.

Oh nothing happened. I have an account on .ml that I usually use but it’s been acting super slow all day long. Just something us refugees have to deal with 🦾

Hey all. Replying from .world since…well you guys know.

Anyway, thank you for all your support over the past weeks. It’s helped us get to this point.

A word of caution: The build that was released is slightly outdated and there are a few issues that have already been addressed in that build. Unfortunately because you can’t replace the build in review, we were not able to update it as we went through this nearly week-long back and forth with Apple. It required an appeal to get us onto the store.

With that said, I’ll be releasing the final version of 0.0.2 tonight to TestFlight, and will begin build versioning starting at 0.1.0, which will be the next release on the store. I’ll try and have something submitted to them tonight and hopefully it will be reviewed and released within a day or so.

Cheers!

I’ll do this in next update. Sorry for delay on getting it done, been focusing on some other things.

All stuff I’ve got on the todo list. Thanks!

Unless I’m having a brain fart, I think the buttons are optional now. I’m working so can’t check

Don’t worry I have your back. We’ll take ‘em together.

You had to be there.

Appreciate your work as always.

Hmm, and I’m guessing your email is verified correct? That could be an issue with their servers. That’s just the response the app is getting back from lemmy.world.

memmy dev here. That’s why I’m so excited to see multiple groups working on things! I could never appease everyone with one design, and frankly I find I prefer the one in memmy (well of course right?) over the one that mlem uses. But that’s me coming from using Apollo for Reddit for years. There were quite a few different UIs for Reddit apps as well.

Like I said to someone else, I think that anyone who knows Swift should go over and help out with the Mlem development. They have a great app as well and we all need all the help we can get!

https://lemmy.ml/c/memmy

Fixed that in the latest release. Sorry about that…

Those are some of the main reasons. Also, the fact that it can be easily released as an Android build as well is nice, especially for users who would want a more Apollo-like feel on android devices. I have not personally tested Jeroba, but from screenshots I have seen (while it does look great!) it doesn’t have the same look as some of the old Reddit apps.

Bottom line is this is a huge preference thing. I don’t want to take anything at all away from Mlem. If you know Swift and think you can contribute to that project then by all means you should! Looks like a great project. Glad that there’s so many people working on things for Lemmy already!