ghost_bug [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 13th, 2026

help-circle


  • This morning many schools in Italy (maybe also other countries?) were evacuated because of bomb threats delivered by email. Source (cw: italian).

    The content of the letter is absurd, it looks like the lowest-effort trolling attempt ever (but I don’t know, maybe bomb threats are all like this) and I will translate it to you while preserving the tone because you have to see this shit. This is what was shared in the media.

    the letter (cw: racism, mentions of misogyny, violence and genocide)

    This is Mikhail Andropov, leader of the Vilayat of Misogynistan. We came here to annihilate you. We will enact genocide against italians.

    I long prepared for this: killing every single one of you. I just left in your building, in a plastic bag, a potent exposive device with a remote trigger.

    I positioned it such that the shockwave will spread to the whole building. Of you will only remain bones and a bloody pulp. Futhermore, we placed a bomb in the engine of the car of your prime minister.

    Afterwards, we will finish all the survivors by stabbing.

    Of course, politicians are already talking about “cybercriminal hacking attack”, “strategy of tension”, “hybrid warfare” and things like that. Every headline makes sure to include the russian name mentioned in the letter.


  • My main arguments against are AI are how it insidiously makes you stupider, and that the removal of humans from the creative process is pure poison

    I agree with both arguments, in fact both are not even a matter of opinion, they are objectively true statements.

    I hope, if you met an indie artist who had their work 100% stolen by a big corpo, you wouldn’t say “oh you shouldn’t argue about that because IP is ultimately an undesirable concept”.

    Obviously I wouldn’t say that. I would probably say something like “that sucks, I’m sorry that happened. Of course the big corpo would do that, IP laws only actually apply to anyone beneath them and that’s why they are not worth defending. And the burgeois state that allows that to happen is also not worth defending, so become a communist and push for revolution”

    I do not mean to imply that any artist victim of theft from AI is an hypocrite. But they should not be running towards burgeois law for protection, that does not work! They should be moving (and we must help them) towards radicalization against the entire burgeois state, and towards marxist theory so they can understand what’s happening and not be powerless anymore.


  • It is interesting to me how today western leftist spaces completely lose the plot when it comes to AI. In my opinion it just shows how low revolutionary consciousness is in general. When the discourse gets better it will be a good sign. I agree that we need to push back against AI but we need better arguments, and to find them we need better (marxist) analysis.

    All “theft” arguments ultimately rely on the existence and enforcement of intellectual property, which we want to abolish. We should stop making these arguments period.

    All “labour” arguments describe the consequences of any productivity-increasing technological development under capitalism. We know Marx already covered all of this: companies lower costs by firing workers, the rate of profit falls, we all get closer to another economic crisis (the AI bubble), and the workers suffer. And yes, LLMs can in fact increase productivity in software development. I’m not talking about vibe coding or anything like that, that is just a technical debt trap the big corporations are all falling right into so they can fire workers because code quality does not matter to them. I’m talking about describing a problem (even in abstract) to an LLM which suggests a solution and then you write your own code based on that, without ever copy-pasting anything. If you have ever written code you might have tried using LLMs this way because it they can be legitimately useful if you are stuck, and from what I understand this is more similar to how House House used LLMs if we are to believe them, and I have no reason to doubt them because the scenario they described is very realistic.

    All other externalities are not a problem exclusive to LLMs. In a capitalist state the capitalists decide what infrastructure to build, and at the expense of whom.

    I agree with the other comments that say that the negative reviews for Big Walk are mostly because players feel betrayed by a game they considered progressive. It does not matter that House House boycotted Microsoft consoles, a decision with material consequences against a BDS-listed corporation. AI was used in any amount during development so the game is now evil, corrupted and ruined, and it actually was all along. That is idealist nonsense. I understand being disappointed and upset (no one has to feel bad about having emotions), but let’s not allow that to cloud our judgment and analysis.

    For the record, I am against AI but I don’t think House House deserve this kind of reaction based on their history and the information currently available.