Sprich:
Ich glaube da können wir die Schuld nicht einfach auf irgendwelche Ausgestalter:innen abwälzen.
You are right that they use less resources and cause less damage if they don’t work, at least as long as our economical system does not internalize external costs and does not discourage using non-regenerating resources. From that point of view it’s probably better they do nothing worse than being retired. In a better system they would do something beneficial.
I just wanted to oppose the notion that they unlocked the “prosperity” achievement (i.e. we now have prosperity forever thanks to them) through hard work and have deserved to retire at 60.
and let the US take care of our defense (although this applies to the rest of europe, not france).
The known reserves will be gone in ~50 years (at the current rate of usage, which is only 4.3% of the worlds primary energy consumption, if we replace the 75% fossil fuels with nuclear then “poof its gone” ). There will be more but it will get increasingly more difficult to extract it. Extracting Uranium from seawater is still in its laboratory phase and its far from clear it can be done economically. The long term disposal of nuclear waste is still largely unsolved.
We should only retire at 60 after we figured it all out, shouldn’t we?
Generational conflict placard holder here.
And all the productivity gains are based on the abundance of cheap fossil energy. We tell ourselves its based on our ingenuity but thats an obvious lie. Or since it is France also the availability of cheap Uranium. The use of which has no negative consequences and will be available forever. Oh wait…
But lets make sure the coming generations have to feed our lazy asses from the age of 60 onward as a supplemental “fuck you”
You support that plans even after you concluded that i is not possible to pay for without selling France and Europe to Putin?
EDIT: forget what i said. I did read too much into this. You did not say that its only possible by selling France and Europe to Putin.
Die Pferde müssen sich halt anpassen. /s
Wenn du konservativ eingestellt bist solltest du dich eher darüber beschweren dass es (fast) keine grünen Konservative gibt, anstatt den Grünen vorzuwerfen zu wenig konservativ zu sein.
and always your friend!
The population does not grow in most of the world anymore. Why do we need to improve people’s quality of life all the time? Why don’t we improve the sustainability of the quality we have right now? Because its abysmal and this will (or is it already ?) fuck up everybody’s quality of life for the next 100k years. Resources are limited and unlimited growth is not possible.
i am willing to rent it to you while i dont need it sam
True but the batteries in them still are from china.
its not about their team winning, its about watching the others suffer
No, it does not translate to that (?)
I said that one of two violent groups is largely of migrant background (probably more second and third generation than actual immigrants). And that they are badly integrated and often straight out hostile to French culture and society.
This is because in the reality thing out there that’s the case.
I did not even talk about the reasons you already assume i’m a racist and see it as a direct consequence of the race/culture of the immigrants.
I’m out of here, have fun in your bubble…
Apology accepted.
Akktschually… We are around peak glacier meltwater. Imagine the situaton when they are gone. Its the dry winter (less meltwater from snow).