Leela [it/its]

Yes, I saw Ada trying to out a trans person. It was a very odd experience to see from a supposedly safe space, and a definite disregard for their privacy.

I was there and I was randomly claimed to be DroneRights’ alternative account without any sort of proof to back it up. I could have doxxed myself just to prove that I am not that user in any way whatsoever.

That’s your only proof? My guy. Did you just learn yesterday that more than a single person uses it/its pronouns? Damn.

Something would have been shown if there was evidence about it.

I think the point of this is to bait me into doxxing myself. If we were to have the same IP, I would have got a screenshot or a link to the modlog that proves it.

How was it even matched to DroneRights? Can you show me the proof it was? Could you please give everyone the damning piece of evidence that proves once and for all that I am an alt account of DroneRights. If my IP was matched to DR’s IP, then I need to see this. I am genuinely stupefied by this. Like, genuinely give me a link to the modlogs or send a screenshot, any sort of proof. I did not know my IP was matched to theirs. I know my IP should be Romanian because that’s where I am from, and indicating Bucharest because we are using a private relay on our iPhone (the iCloud+ thing).

Do you need me to doxx myself and send over my location, face, home and everything to prove I am not DroneRights? Do you need me to compare blood samples? Because I feel that simply saying the truth won’t be enough for you.

You can’t possibly fathom that ANYONE would actually defend a narcissistic person. You can’t fathom that ANYONE would stand up against injustice besides just talking about standing up against injustice. You can’t imagine someone doing this shit out of love and care, because you have zero concern about people with NPD. As long as you will continue this dehumanizing nonsense, you never will. What do you need me to give you to prove it to you that I am not just an alt? I am my own person with my own choices who has seen this stuff and decided to jump in. Not the first time I’ve done it, not the last time I will, either. If you choose to not believe me, that’s fine. Believe what you want. But you can’t fathom that anyone else would disagree with you, would stand up against you and would point out your hypocrisy.

Last thing: you don’t know me. You don’t know who I am, what I do, what I like, what I dislike, what I eat and drink. If you knew, you’d know I’m not an alt account.

If it’s not true, I will make it true. I will make sure it comes true, no matter what happens. The internet is a huge opportunity for those who weren’t usually represented in offline spaces to be themselves and form their own communities. The internet was always a place where barriers and prejudices shouldn’t have mattered. We need to protect that principle. And if that principle is not true or not valid, I will make it true. I will work my hardest to make it so. And nobody can stop me.

Removed by mod

Cyberbullying can’t be undone simply by “turning off your computer”. These are real people harassing other real people and profiting off of the fact they are anonymous and probably won’t be held accountable for their vileness, meanwhile the victim will just suffer and be scared to even wake up in the morning. This shit is SERIOUS, especially for those with cluster B personality disorders who are already HEAVILY stigmatized as it is. The internet is supposed to be a save haven, and the only way to maintain that is through fighting and actively pointing out toxic people such as yourself.

This whole thing was started because Starmer has a hate boner for it and deleted its comment. Starmer provoked someone, so they shouldn’t be surprised when the provoked responds back.

Removed by mod

If it didn’t have the information, you would’ve said “YOU CLAIM THINGS WITHOUT PROOF, YOU’RE LYING!!1!1!1!1!1!1!” There’s no winning against a mindset like this, because no matter what the victim does, they will not be trusted.

I have owned up to my mistake and noted that I did not think of my argument thoroughly here, as noted by how Adriaan said this.

However, all I was attempting to say was that I was concerned over what the implication of this law was, and another comment did raise the concern that, instead of destroying the clothes altogether, they would still be dumped. At least not destroyed anymore, just left there to rot.

what were you thinking when you thought of your first version? that sounds like a creepy scenario. what if I don’t want to see it and it’s everywhere. I could click on “I’m Not Interested” and flood social media with reports, but if there are “billions on billions” of AI nudes, then who would be able to stop them from being seen in their feed? I’d say that, while locking them up won’t change the sexist system which pushes this behavior, it is a far less creepy and weird scenario than having billions of unconsensual nudes online.

they didn’t want us degenerates seeing their drip, obviously /j

This made me think of a scenario: a countrymapper kid grows up and becomes a vlogger. Should Porsche have made tanks, they’d flex with a Porsche tank instead of a Porsche car.

Romania.

yeah, I didn’t look into it deeply, my bad.

so in my country (I’m European, specifically Romanian) we have this streaming service called SkyShowtime. guess what? its DRM is so bad that SkyShowtime just won’t work beyond being on the website. it won’t play anything to you.

that is because either Peacock or Paramount+ are also DRM-blocked, because all there is to it is Peacock and Paramount+ with the Commonwealth Sky and Showtime brands that NBCUniversal and Paramount are respectively owning, and they combined it together and sell it to countries with lesser purchasing power parity, such as Romania.