Clinically depressed, chronically online,
Socialist discordian statist for open science,
Independent journalism and gay crime.
My Communities:
!art_alchemist_guild@lemmy.today — Ask, share, learn and show off with the most DIY of artists.
!cool_rocks@lemmy.today — For cool rocks.
!brandnewsentence@lemmy.today — For brand new sentences
!Independent_Media@lemmy.today — Independent world journalism news feed.
!indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works — Independent news from Canada.
!wildfeed@sh.itjust.works — Trash. Global, diverse news, reports, blogs and listicles.
I keep making communities. Please help.
This is my main account.
Former Me:
ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
icytrees@lemmy.today
trash_goblin@piefed.zip (fuck piefed)
icytrees@sh.itjust.works
woad@lemmy.ml
Land back. Do drugs.
- 904 Posts
- 1.53K Comments
1·2 months agoIf sharing information wasn’t a threat all the major social media companies wouldn’t be trying to censor the internet.
You could have not talked about it.
What if she owns the penis museum?
4·2 months agoBecause it was designed to hook kids and they knew it. It’s what some of the recent lawsuits are about.
I’m deeply embarrassed for both our countries for failing to look past the short term.
Whatever benefit could be gained by shunning Canada in return for better deals with America would only last until the next election cycle. Even if they get the 500-billion-dollar payout they’re after.
Otherwise, it looks like the Carney Liberals are here to stay for a while, I predict another Cretién tenure, and they won’t be willing to deal with an America that conducts separatist psy-ops in our country, especially if they’re successful.
For now it looks like treaty rights supercede any legal avenues for separation, so we can be grateful for that.
51·2 months agoYou’re confusing me with someone else.
Just to be clear it was a permanent ban from that community. The other ones were temp bans.
Nope, no nuanced opinions allowed.
It isn’t a day on lemmy if someone doesn’t call you a nazi for bullshit reasons.
You mean where you started calling me a molester, misgendered me, and said I defend fucking kids? No thanks. You seem too riled up for the kind of conversation.
Are you really arguing that laws are synonymous with morality?
I appreciate that. I like Lemmy for the most part, and the response is pretty much what I expected.
Why does it interest you?
You’re mad because I was busy for a day?
Engaging in debate is fun and a great way to test your knowledge and biases, I don’t know what else to tell you.
Again, I’m not dying on it and I’m not in favor of incest. I thought it would be an interesting post for this community.
The varieties of ways incest can be harmful are already, or should be illegal. Incest in itself isn’t harmful unless they’re producing children with each other.
To be fair I’m not arguing for incest, I’m arguig against it being criminally punishable.
Because incest isn’t inherently bad and we already have crimes for all the reasons it could be bad.
A one man play of macbeth done with balloons.