I just found out the rumours of JD Vance fucking a couch were made up. I can’t tell you how disappointed I am. As a couchfucker myself, I was hoping to finally be able to vote for someone who represents my interests. Sadly, I will no longer be voting for Trump/Vance this election.
If I had a nickel every time a Kennedy lost part of their brain, I’d have at least 4 nickels by now.
I was on an ostensibly leftist subreddit thread about Biden stepping down, and there were liberals talking about how Kamala is too risky because she’s not a white man, or because she’s otherwise too progressive to appeal to undecided voters. They’re wringing their hands about how even Kamala is too progressive and they should go with a conservative white guy instead.
But, I thought Biden was the only one capable of defeating Trump and anyone who disagreed was a secret Republican who wanted Trump to win?
Well, don’t worry, Biden supporters. I’ve taken your arguments to heart, and you can rest assured that I’ll write in Biden this fall, no matter who the Democrats decide to run. It’s the only way to defeat Trump.
See, I genuinely don’t know whether you’re joking or not.
Somewhere down at the 10th level: The parts in Sonic the Hedgehog where Sonic is about to drown underwater and the music gets really fast and dramatic.
Well, that seems to be the solution. Thanks. I know it’s silly that I had to ask, but there are so many things I could reset that I was worried I would accidentally make my life more difficult by resetting the wrong thing.
Whenever I try to log into Hexbear on Firefox, I get an error along the lines of “Error: incorrect_login”. However, I’m still able to log in when I use Chrome.
Is there an easy way to fix this? (E.g. is there something I can “clear” or “purge” or “reset”?) I’d really like to continue using Firefox rather than Chrome if possible.
I was thinking Rob Reiner from the thumbnail.
I visited the Wikipedia article on Henry Kissinger, and I noticed this sentence:
In contrast, Kissinger is an immensely beloved figure within China, with China News Service describing him in his obituary as someone “who had a sharp vision and a thorough understanding of world affairs”.[11][12]
What’s the deal with that?
The school I’m a grad student at is still on strike. Some faculty aren’t on board, but some are, including a history professor who specializes in labour studies. He played a bit of banjo at the picket line yesterday.
Some of those cannot reasonably be avoided in a shower, whereas it’s not necessary to urinate in the shower. Am I a weirdo for wanting to take very simple steps that reduce the amount of urine I come into contact with in my daily life? I don’t pee in my kitchen sink just because it goes down the drain and I know the dishes are going to get washed anyway.
If it “all” got washed down the drain, it would be unnecessary to clean showers (or sinks or toilets, for that matter).
I don’t think it’s “childish”, I think it’s gross and unhygienic, especially as someone who has to clean the shower/bathtub.
Fair enough. I guess if there’s one specific situation that’s come up more than once, it’s that a lot of donations are done through “Trusts” or “Foundations”. If anyone knows whether there exist directories for finding information about specific trusts or foundations other than just Googling the names, that would be very useful. (For context, I’m in Canada.)
His death was certainly good timing.
“Women” is fine as a noun, but what should be used as an adjective if not “female”?
This was something I posted just before the last megathread got unpinned, and I wanted to consider it a bit further:
In many parts of the internet, I often see “wholesome” posts and memes that say something vague and positive like “You are amazing!” or “You’re beautiful!” or “You’re valid!” My personal reaction to these posts is generally skepticism, partly because whoever posted it almost certainly didn’t have me in mind, and it’s a bit like if someone I’ve never met came up to me in real life and started praising and complimenting me – my first thought would be, “This person is being insincere and they probably want something from me” (which may be true in a sense, e.g. the person might want likes and comments on their post).
But I get the sense that this isn’t how most people feel about such posts. Which means that there’s something that everyone else gets out of such posts that I don’t, and there’s something about everyone else that I don’t understand. So, I ask with sincerity and the intention to understand, can anyone describe the value they get out of these general vaguely positive posts of affirmation?
The responses I got emphasized the importance of sincerity in the person expressing love for the audience of the message – which, if the message is on the internet where everyone can see it, is potentially everyone in the world. Wanting the best for everyone in the world is a tall order.
And yeah, I guess that is a bit of a sticking point for me. It’s easy to say “I love and wish the best for all people everywhere”, but it’s very difficult to practice it. So many people claim to love all living things in the universe one moment, and then go on the internet and tell people they don’t like to kill themselves the next moment. If you say you “love” everyone, then in what sense do you “love” Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Joe Biden, Vaush, Kamala Harris, J.K. Rowling, Jeff Bezos, Pete Buttigieg, Jeffrey Epstein, Mike Cernovich, Andy Ngo, Ben Shapiro, Marjorie Taylor Greene, the woman who made the Giggle app, and everyone else whose existence makes you angry? I’m not saying it’s impossible, but I do think it means you have to have have a deep answer to the question “What is love?” (an answer which goes beyond “Baby, don’t hurt me”).
There are few people I can think of who I think really have that kind of love for humanity, a love that’s even capable of including the people listed above. As much of a cliche as it is, the first person who comes to mind is Mister Rogers, but I would also include certain activists such as Martin Luther King Jr or Leslie Feinberg. Like, if MLK said that he loves even the Marjorie Taylor Greenes of the world and wants to liberate them from the hatred they carry in their hearts, I’d believe him. But that’s not just because of his words – it’s because his words were backed up by his actions.
I do think it’s good to try to cultivate some kind of universal love for all humanity and all living things, but I wish people would be honest and acknowledge how difficult it is, and how often we fail at it. I’m an atheist, but this is one thing I’ve always found interesting about Christianity and the Christian individuals I respect most – this idea of aiming to love everyone as Jesus did, but also acknowledging that we are all sinners who will fall short of godly perfection, and understanding that to practice this love is a lifelong challenge and not just something you can make a wholesome meme about and be done with it.
I’m not sure if I have a point. Maybe I’m just being way too solemn about the word “love”, and maybe I’m taking internet posts too seriously for my own good.
My understanding is that Lovecraftian horror often involves people driven insane by things beyond their comprehension. But I’m confused all the time and there are TONS of things beyond my comprehension, so I don’t really see what the big deal is.