Ulu-Mulu-no-die

It doesn’t matter, it’s a bait to raise engagement metrics and a lot of people are falling for it.

But beehaw users can interact with .world communities if they want, it’s .world users that wouldn’t see it.

There’s probably no purpose in doing that, but it is possible.

I don’t know about kbin but it’s certainly possible on lemmy:

• beehaw defederated from lemmy.world
• lemmy.world did NOT defederate from beehaw

(i.e. non beehaw members cannot post on beehaw, but beehaw members can go interact on other instances). But as far as I understand that’s not how it works.

It depends, you believe that’s not how it works because you’re thinking of both sides defederating each other, but defederation is one-side.

For example, beehaw defederated from lemmy.world but lemmy.world didn’t defederate from beehaw, so lemmy.world people cannot participate on beehaw but beehaw can participate on lemmy.world.

It’s actually a bit more complicated than that, since lemmy.world people can still participate in beehaw discussions but only lemmy.world people would see those comment, I think also other instances that are not defederated can but I’m not sure about this.

I don’t think beehaw doesn’t fit the fediverse, I do believe it doesn’t fit every user.

As I understand it, they want to be a safe place for a very specific audience, that is, people afraid to be harassed for who they are, that could also include people with extreme social anxiety, that’s why it’s so heavily policed and they defederate from a lot of other instances.

It’s like having a heavily moderated subreddit, you wouldn’t say it doesn’t fit reddit just because they don’t accept contribution from everyone.

The purpose of the fediverse is to have things spread out so one or few nodes dying doesn’t affect the entire system, it’s also about avoiding corporate control, the same principles on which the internet was founded.

I don’t think it means having to trust everyone or accepting everyone into your local group.