This is quite literally possible.

The arrow must go up bubble must inflate.

The card says moops.

Ha ha

Isn’t Jeffries supposed to be in that picture?

Yes, it is.

That money doing laps is serving the already wealthy, and isn’t being used to support people who actually need it.

This guy fuckin.

Ah, I didn’t even consider that because I don’t generally think of people in those terms.

I seem to recall that state governors have won the presidency.

Why not 889 gazillion? If you’re going to dream, dream big.

Not with that attitude.

You’re correct.

CoS is assholes. You’re looking for TST.

There’s still time. They may well be waiting until they can pair election fraud lies with a swath of arrests.

That’s why they turned it off at the end.

Is the immigrant caravan in the room with us right now?

The early part of your comment said

seems to imply that there is a correct way to use AI.

LLMs are universally hugbots, telling you what they think you want to hear. That’s always going to be a bad way to get accurate solutions. I think we agree on that.

There are prediction models that aren’t LLMs which can be useful. Your comment was unclear on whether you considered LLMs to be the entirety of “AI” or not.

“AI” is continually improving prediction models. There are excellent use cases for prediction models, like weather forecasting, or planning distribution of emergency resources ahead of impending disaster.

But expecting a desk jockey to expect any prediction model to accurately create anew thing based on a human description of what that thing should be like would require the prediction model to possess its own creativity. That’s just not a thing.

North by Northwest. 1959, Hitchcock, Cary Grant.

2001: A Space Odyssey. 1968, Kubrick/Clarke. The movie by itself is an experience; paired with reading the book makes it brilliant.