That’s still not normal dude.

There’s a sentence before that with a major detail you are ignoring.

Unfounded for the main cause, it’s still a cause of the amnesia.

See this quote further down…. You did actually read the article… yeah…? You aren’t just taking a quote of context and using that for the entire basis of your asinine argument… are you…?

But if there are significant memory gaps that may be related to childhood trauma—it may be time to seek support. A therapist is a great place to start. If you sense there’s a medical issue causing your memory loss, give your doctor a call.

So yes, it is absolutely a cause as that SHOULD prove without a doubt….

At the ages they specified, that’s NOT normal, maybe at 60 years yes, but not THAT young. You can’t just ignore key details and make your own story up.

Also, when people say half the time, it’s not a precise amount obviously, and you don’t think that’s not part of people lying to themselves? It’s probably less than half, but they don’t want to admit it, hence the approximation that’s quite obviously not the right amount.

They also stated it was half the time they don’t recall and the other half the story reminded them, so until that point, they didn’t recall anything actually… so why are you making shit up and lying here?

Right, but remembering nothing isn’t normal either… especially at the young age of 30, you seem to be ignoring major details here.

Just because some events are distorted doesn’t mean all should be. This seems to be the key part of the conversation that you’ve missed. I wasn’t absolute in any of my statements, yet you have been.

Which is factually incorrect, you should be able to recall specific events at all part of your life, your link doesn’t say otherwise now does it…?

The first sentence of your link says the opposite of everything you have claimed…

Despite the vivid and convincing detail with which people can recollect emotional experiences from their past, emotional memory is malleable.

Says its malleable, where does it say it gets erased…? You aren’t conflating these two vastly different things are you…?

You realize normal is somewhere in the middle…? Between remembering nothing and everything…?

I never said everything, and remembering nothing isn’t normal.

I did say usually, I didn’t say only cause you muppet.

And did you actually read the article?

But if there are significant memory gaps that may be related to childhood trauma—it may be time to seek support. A therapist is a great place to start. If you sense there’s a medical issue causing your memory loss, give your doctor a call.

Trauma is a cause, but it’s unfounded for the main cause. Which I never stated, maybe read the entire article and don’t take a specific quote out of context…?

That is just factually incorrect And what people lie to themselves to make them feel better. Humans are great at recollection, why would you claim otherwise…?

The age 0-3 is the only time you should have zero recollection, anything else is something you should talk to neurologist or psychologist about, but sure lie to make yourself feel better I guess…?

You should still be able to recall specific events at all portions of your life, it’s abnormal not to, but you can defend it and ignore potentially life limiting issues if you want.

Yeah, that’s it normal, hence why they remember and you don’t dude… you don’t think that’s not strange? That multiple friends recall events easily and you don’t…?

That still ain’t normal dude. You’re supposed to be able to recall memories from any point of your life…

That’s… that’s not normal.

Thats usually trauma suppressing memories, sorry mate,

Ah yes, classic blaming someone else for your problems, seatbelts aren’t even an American invention lol.

It’s all child safety, yet you can’t grasp that?

Last message.

Child locks are so children can’t open the door and fall out of a moving vehicle, Tesla’s emergency release overrides said child lock. If it was easily accessible a child could use it and fall out of moving vehicle still. So hence why it’s not an easily accessible handle. Since doing that would endanger children in more situations… you’re a bloody moron if you can’t comprehend this.

Hence why it’s marginally hard to access… so it’s not randomly pulled.

Got it yet? Or do you need some diagrams? Because that’s too much work.

And? A child can be locked in the back of any vehicle with no way out, atleast teslas have a way to still get out… leave it on, and no law an adult is locked back there, with no override to get out. And that’s your Honda, not even a fancy electric car….

The point is, they’re crying about children being locked in the back, yet any current vehicle you’ve been able to chose to do that for bloody decades already, yet a car with a feature to overcome that is being decried. You were locked in the back of your parents car, it’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety.

The hypocrisy that people show just to be mad at something with one actually comprehending why…

Sure I have, and adults can be locked in the back of a normal car with zero way out.

Yet you want to argue that a hard to access release is bad…?

When this problem in a worse way has already ex is Ted for decades…?

Childlocks have zero override, and Teslas do, and yet the argument is child safety…? It’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety. So now there is conflicting safety laws…… you didn’t see that coming now did you? Yeah…

Yes I know it overrides it… that’s not the argument. The argument was, children could be back there, it’s a stupid argument since you can lock them in the back to ANY vehicle, (but Tesla as you stupidly pointed out to ruin your own argument….), so to cry the children can’t find it… is the stupidest fucking argument that could be used to decry this…

Do you need this explained again? Or can you finally comprehend why the argument about children is a red herring?

Trunks don’t have a manual release in the back…. That why they require one…. If they had a manual handle, they wouldn’t require the other handle. As you said hardback don’t need one, why? Because you can crawl into the front where you have access to a manual handle.

You seem to know the rules, but not why, yet you insult that I shouldn’t be in safety? Maybe you should comprehend the rules instead of just knowing them, massive difference and you’ve shown your massively lacking surface knowledge while defending “children could be back there). You know wheee they can be locked in with no escape in ANY OTHER VEHILCE… lmfao you’re not very bright dude.

But I’m done explaining simple things to someone who can only argue, the children!!! While missing the entire point….

deleted by creator

You should NEVER have an adult in the back with the child lock on… since they couldn’t escape in an emergency….

Normal vehicles don’t have a bypass, so an adult would be locked in any vehicle if it was on….

Tesla’s atleast have a feature to overcome this….

It’s quite sad that you needed this explained…. Do you even own a drivers license? If you do, please turn it in for the safety of everyone on the road, not just the adults you lock in the back seat…

Yes so what difference does a hard to make emergency access do when in any normal car they can be locked in…?

It’s hard to access so kids CANT open the door while it’s moving and fall out. Thats why vehicles have the child lock feature available… it’s quite sad that you need this explained.

And the reason why it’s hard to access is so a kid can’t accidentally open it and fall out….

Having it bypass the child locks defeats the singular purpose of the child lock lmfao. What is with these arguments?

Didn’t bmw have this in the 90s…?