That’s all I was saying, quite frankly.

I feel like I need to give up on the internet.

*Right.

It was a good one.

Their tenets are amazing.

THERE ARE SEVEN FUNDAMENTAL TENETS

I - One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.

II - The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.

III - One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.

IV - The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one’s own.

V - Beliefs should conform to one’s best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one’s beliefs.

VI - People are fallible. If one makes a mistake, one should do one’s best to rectify it and resolve any harm that might have been caused.

VII - Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word.

They’re crowd funded. I don’t know what to tell you. Better than corporate funded MSNBCNNPR.

Definitely the most important part of this story. Glad you’re here to point out the big stuff.

Cenk and Ana are American heroes.

You don’t seem to understand the distinction. You monitor isn’t “broken.” It wasn’t rendered inoperable by Ubuntu. It simply wasn’t compatible with the way you set it up.

You would be incorrect. If the power source shorts, it would heat the wires sufficiently.

Your second monitor was not broken by Ubuntu. Your second monitor was no longer receiving a signal. The distinction is that the second monitor was functional but not compatible.

Palpatine was supposed to return. The clones eventually were turned into a way to let Palpatine jump bodies. But in the immortal words of the Matrix, “Not like this. Not like this.”

It’s.

Hell yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i89cMnfxXy0&t=39

NYT also used it and I believe they’re the ones who broke the story first.

I’m no RFK supporter, but that shit was muckraking by NYT. Granted, I question his choice in using the excuse of having a worm in his brain to avoid paying alimony to his ex-wife, but it wasn’t being reported honestly and they acted like this was some new revelation that happened in the last few years rather than well over a decade ago.

RFK is not electable, but I will concede that I like three of his positions quite a bit:

• Money out of politics
• Housing and barring corporate ownership of single-occupancy homes
• Cutting defense spending

He’s got so many issues that keep him from being a serious contender, but those three subjects are important and he stands on the right side in that regard.

No.

See my comment in a parallel conversation to this.

Surprised they didn’t end the comment with, “what do you think, chat?”

B’r