I read this article a while ago, super useful. The entire time, the author was wrestling with very real conditions, with material reality, but had such an obvious idealistic position with respect to social conditions that it was honestly funny to read. The conclusions about DEI honestly just came from nowhere, with absolutely no reason, in the middle of an article that could otherwise be considered good analysis.
But this is what happens when investors want to know realistically what’s happening: the advisors aren’t going to lie because that will hurt their business. So they do a good analysis. But a step further (the ‘and why is it so’) is just nonsense again
Good question, I would also love to know if any more information was divulged/came out. I honestly just forgot about it