

What are they going to do?
Put a thought in your brain you can’t ignore or refute.
A truly terrifying concept for the Lib mind


What are they going to do?
Put a thought in your brain you can’t ignore or refute.
A truly terrifying concept for the Lib mind
you keep equating me to other people and saying I believe things I don’t to try and “win” this argument. You are arguing with yourself.
An interwebs response, given that I’ve only addressed things you’ve said directly with quotations from your comments I was responding to. I think you’re just butthurt at having social axioms you’ve always believed were unquestionable being questioned. But that part is an actual assumption and not directly tied to any one thing you’ve said, I’ll be honest. Either way, you’re in no way making this interesting enough to continue, so please go ahead and make a final defense in summation of your steadfast devotion to Bronze Age Goat Fucker morality. Hell, I might even read it, but based on everything you’ve said so far, I very much doubt you’ll craft a reply interesting enough to get a response.
whatever narrative helps you feel better about getting your dick wet while you help someone hurt the person they supposedly care about.
A matter between them that has nothing to do with me or anyone else.
Stop pretending to be noble and at least admit its selfish. Its not like its new, cheating has been around for as long as monogamy.
Stop pretending it’s a moral question and just admit you’re insecure and convinced your partner would leave you for a better deal if they could find one.
Grow up
Hilarious advice coming from someone defending a “morality” invented by bronze age goat herders as a way to raise the price they could get for selling their teenaged daughters to their middle aged neighbors.
The entire concept of monogamy is based on the idea that women are property to be defended. There is no good version of that, it’s patriarchy all the way down.
So soon as you want to stop you go ahead.
Same, you moralistic prig.
CHEATING is a moral stance.
That is a religious belief I don’t subscribe to.
Lying is a moral stance. Caring who someone else fucks, even if they also fuck you sometimes is giving credence to Bronze Age goat fuckers and the patriarchy they invented.
You do not get to fuck whoever you want just because they want to fuck you.
Actually them wanting (and being willing, which is different) to fuck you is basically all that matters, everything else is moralistic bullshit added by people who think fucking a 12 year old is fine as long as you “buy” her properly with marriage contract. If you want to agree with those sickos that’s on you, but I genuinely think everyone who thinks there’s something inherently immoral or inherently sacred with sex needs to have their hard drive checked.
Sorry to bring reality to sex.
If that’s what you think happened here you don’t need to apologize. There’s no reality present in your reply at all. You might, however, give some serious thought to apologizing for bringing moralism to sex, because holy fuck I can smell the goat musk on you after that last comment.


Someday, you ShitLibs will.learn that you’ll never be allowed to care away the wealth and power of the ruling class.
Until then, get used to this kind of thing.


DiDnT rEaLiZe ThE iNsTancE i WaS oN!!
Every ShitLib who definitely knew which instance they were on, upon finding out that the commies know more about whatever subject is at hand than they do and it’s not even close.


And the same Libs who’ll blandly say they believe women when discussing Christine Blasey-Ford will call Tara Reade a lying Russian Asset™ and dismiss her entire story. A story which has exactly as much evidence in its favor as Dr Blasey-Ford’s.
Preference is one thing. You framed it as a moral stance, that’s religion whether you want to be religious or not. But please, keep going. The fact that you can’t tell the difference between “we’re apes, there is one naturally monogamous species of Ape, and it isn’t H Sapiens” and a bunch of rules that Bronze Age goat herders made up to increase the price they’d get for selling their teenaged daughters to their middle aged neighbors is fucking hilarious to me. One of those is a religious belief, one is not.


We voted for them to reduce harm News coverage of the harm we’re still doing while we continue to work to get all of the morally corrupt people out. go back to brunch
There, that’s better. We should always strive for accuracy in communication.
Im not religious
Everyone who believes in monogamy is religious. Sexual fidelity is a religious belief. You just think you’re special because the magical thinking you subscribe to is older than the latest batch of fairy tales humans have decided to believe in.
Sorry it’s not what you prudish secular Mormons want to hear.
So that’s still a hard “no” on providing a single source for your nonsense bullshit claims? You’re a lying liar. And your lies are in service to an irredeemably evil empire. May you get exactly what you deserve some day.
Nonsense racism is probably the correct answer…


But you don’t understand! When the wholesome Chungus Blue Liberals dump steam shovels full of money on extractive industries that’s automatically clean energy regardless of what it’ll put in the atmosphere. Only the evil, feckless Red Liberals would ever do anything so evil as subsidizing fossil fuels!!
Just look at all the Liberals in the thread already explaining how this one doesn’t count against their preferred Neoliberal Ghouls, bcs it happened in between the election and the swearing in, so it didn’t really happen, and if it did then it was acceptable, actually, and besides none of those elected representatives are true scotsmen Democrats!
So you’re either a lying liar or you’re completely untethered from reality. You can fuck all the way off either way.


So vote on lifting the income cap.
Then take everyone who voted “no” out back and put them down like the rabid dogs they are and then vote again.
I feel the preceding was actually a little unfair. Dogs don’t choose to be rabid, people do choose to be worthless, greedy fuckwastrels.
So you’re just a fan of open air slave markets or what? Can’t think of any other reason you’re still riding that tired nonsense. It’s been debunker multiple times just in this thread.
“I believe all the idiotic bullshit the US State Department says about anyone who disrupts capitalism or resists the enslavement of their people.”
Fuck you, Lib, there’s nothing based about mass poverty and open air slave markets which is the kind of “freedom” a US color revolution brought to Libya.
Daffy > Donald
Right statement, wrong application. The statement actually is accurately applied to people who think it matters that Democrats win a majority while the Third Way Neoliberal Ghouls control every lever of power in the party. Your Fell For It Again Award is on its way. Unfortunately for you, the prize is Hakeem Jeffries as Speaker.