But in the above case we’re talking about a trans person, whom isn’t transitioning in a physical/biological aspect. Hence they’re a man, but their physicality is female.
They’d be best served the care you’d give other females. Rather than what you’d aim at males.
So a trans man, being fully biological female ends on ER. The personnel shouldn’t refer to them as female and instead give them the treatment intended for males?
It’s about precision and safety to use a correct language in the correct contexts. When talking to the patient, they should obviously not call them a woman or utilise a dead name. But that’s a social context. Not a medical biological relevant one
Why can I not refer to my male friends as bitches?
Men can be male or female.
Women can be male or female.
Nonbinary people fan be male or female.
(Okay there’s also a category of intersex)
One is a social gender, one is a physical sex. There’s a big difference, let’s take a transgender man. Whom is a female and do not intend to transition. They’ll largely appear and act like most men do, but they’ll be female. Them being female only matters in a few contexts.
But man is not equal male. Far from it.
Statistics does also often have reasons to utilise male and female, rather than man or woman. If their sample size is large enough, then further categorisation might make sense, but ultimately it depends on what the statistics are about and whether it’s related to biological features (male/female) or social features (man/woman/non-binary)
The primary difference between a bond and a loan, are the installments. A loan will gradually be paid off, whilst a bond will pay interest yearly and then one installment upon expiration.
So from a return perspective, they’re both having a fixed return and therfore fits defined contribution schemes nicely. As they can sort of guarantee they’ll have the money they’ve promised the pension holder 10 or 30 years down the line
Machines also run slower if you’ve used almost all of your disc space, as OSes does RAM data swaps, for data it can’t/won’t hold in memory. Go down to 10 GB of space and your machine is bloody slow
otherwise why get rid of them?
It’s a Dutch bank, the Dutch pension scheme is in the process of moving from a benefits defined pension scheme (payment known upfront) to a contribution based pension scheme (payment being based on returns). Hence their pension funds have primarily held bonds, that’s changing as historical returns on stonks have been higher.
Whether ING has any pension related holdings, no clue. But that right here could very well be the reason. It’s also the single biggest factor for why the bond rates are rising globally. It’s estimated to impact about 3TN € worth of capital on the European bonds market, once the transition is in full effect next year
Goal is not surveillance tooling, it’s autonomous weapons
It’s a cold war nobody dares talking about, because they’re aware the technology they’re developing to enact a new status quo will make consumer grade equipment more than capable of killing and thus have created a heightened risk of lone wolf and small terror cell attacks. Which is going to be their argument for needing to track everything online, it’s a multilayered shit sandwich
Caesar was so synonymous with emperor, they had to change the pronunciation of a letter to differentiate Caesar and Kaiser
Half of those are due to cultural differences.
EVs, Americans wants big shiny difficult to build thing. Chinese wants small, simple, effective car.
Hence American EVs started with big stationwagons, while Chinese EVs began with small hatchbacks. Then they built the larger models after, ontop of the knowledge from the smaller builts.
Solar power, American power grids always favoured reliable production output and never had a boner on for renewables due to the peak and no production cycles. And arguably, the reason everyone is talking about renewables again is due to improvement within battery tech, which positions China nicely due to their willingness to exploit rare earth materials
Can’t even pay off the debt of the US, plenty of ways to spend it
Titles ending on engineer is so bloated, basically anything within IT is an engineer. A support level 1 engineer. A software engineer. A Quality Assurance engineer. And the list goes on, historical reason being corporate pay bands being based on titles, hence engineers were offered better pay
Samsung does too, the aim is office workers in European + USA, which gets a new phone sponsored every few years
I can impersonate a pretty good Indian accent, it’s not super culturally accepted to walk around telling people they’ve called Microsoft customer service
Different brands still carry a large difference in smell, the only reason I can’t give a name is because I don’t drink a ton.
I know people able to tell when someone in the room are on their periods, bloodhounds are insanity smellers
Can’t everyone burp on command?
I feel like farting on command is the rare trait
It differs based on country and which immigrants they got when.
In Denmark as an example; there’s a fairly clear cut between Turks making döner, Kurds making pizza and Iranians making shawarma
If you want women only housing, you say that. If you want female only housing, you say that.
Although none of them would ever refer exclusively to AFAB.
Women only, would refer to anyone considering themselves a woman (non binary not included)
Female only, would refer to anyone legally considered a female (I believe most countries have a signature in the SSN - I’m aware the US don’t, but it’s still an internal field registered somewhere)