It’s not always easy to distinguish between existentialism and a bad mood.

  • 5 Posts
  • 343 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Yeah, it’s definitely an open question if they are being honest for honesty’s sake or just trying to get ahead of people realising that the game is slop-infested in obvious ways.

    Assuming the first, the number is definitely based on vibes, but 0.1% of say ten million lines of code is still a lot of code, and the way LLMs have been shoved into every nook and cranny of the major IDEs, demanding proof of zero tokens spent during development puts enterprise devs in a weird spot, especially with stack overflow all but defunct and the various tool vendors increasingly assuming you’ll be using them in LLM-first dev scenarios and skimping on providing in-depth guidelines, or slopping them out.

    It sucks.




  • Developers House House told Aftermath via email that “LLMs were used sparingly by House House to help work through difficult technical challenges and bugs”, and that they “estimate that well under 0.1% of Big Walk’s code had anything to do with this usage”. They also stress that “generative AI was not used in any other context when making the game”.

    Not to get all doctorow on this, but I generally don’t think we should concede this approach to using LLMs to the yooooooo I just vibecoded an FIFA 2027 cloen for android watch WITH MY DICK!!!11!! people.

    If/when a time comes when genAI isn’t actively ruining everything and doesn’t need all the RAM and hard drive space in the world to be useful, using it like that seems a far cry better than even what torvalds is currently doing.





  • First of all straight up telling an employee that we don’t like your cancer so we’re letting you go is just unfathomable, those people are already living in an Ancapistan of their own mind.

    Employees objected to the imagery as well. Board member and Co-Executive Director Hsiao-Wei Wang wrote that she “did not support applying the Milady aesthetic to a 1000-year vision mandate.” Mr. Buterin’s answer was that “the controversialness of those aesthetics is itself part of the point.”

    What exactly is the point, Vitalik, would you please spell it out for the rest of us plebs?

    Like it’s either making sure the company culture is compatible with freeze-peach neoreaction because you are planning to do, or have done and it’s about to be revealed, unhinged shit, or you’re just grooming people into learned helplessness because cult bullshit in the workplace these days gets you trillion dollar valuations.

    Or maybe you are twelve and still think the vaunted third way/The Greater Good is 4chan coded libertarianism.











  • Presumably you still need to believe that these are the specific loans that you are least likely to see a return on though, otherwise why get rid of them?

    The way the bubble pops will probably be a bunch of normal things happening, except cumulatively they cause investors to shy away from further bankrolling this mess and someone important won’t have enough money at some crucial point. It certainly won’t be sam altman laughing maniacally and dissolving into a mound of scurrying cockroaches.