I think it does use cellular. But theoretically, it could use a mesh network of all applicable cars that hops back to some entrance nodes into the manufacturer’s network or cheap exit nodes to the broader internet.
Edit, autocorrect
Unless explicitly stated, all content posted by this user, is done so under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED (non-AI).
I think it does use cellular. But theoretically, it could use a mesh network of all applicable cars that hops back to some entrance nodes into the manufacturer’s network or cheap exit nodes to the broader internet.
Edit, autocorrect
Maybe don’t award your security to the lowest bidder…
Wow… I completely forgot about their existence until today. They’ve been low quality pseudonews for about a decade now, and I have written them off as irrelevant.
I’m not suggesting it be bypassed, but you should know their current blocks are local browser cookie based…
This doesn’t seem like it’s anything that affected users’ cyber safety. It was a graffiti attack on the landing page, which was vulnerable to these attacks (because it seemed to have been overlooked during patching operations). Politics aside (because the messages were allegedly horrific, and hate pisses me off), this is basically spray painting a giant phallic object on the side of the building. Disgusting, should be severely reprimanded, but ultimately harmless.
Or did I misunderstand?
Gotcha. Ok. This article makes a whole lot more sense now. Thank you!!
…Yet both Android and Apple phones use MEMS silicon for their devices, so why were only Apple phones affected? The answer, it seems, is because Apple recently defected from traditional quartz-based clocks in its phones in favor of clocks that are also made of MEMS silicon.
So, they ask the question of why iPhones are the only ones affected if androids also went to MEMS, then answers if by saying that apple went to MEMS. Are they saying that the clocks in Androids still use quartz, but iPhones use MEMS clocks, even though they both use general MEMS silicon?
I don’t speak Dutch, but it’d be a shame if someone found and distributed this “copyrighted” text, such as this link and this link, as they’re trying to block people from accessing, quite possibly, the most influential and important piece of writing, created by a little girl, chronicling her and her people’s torture and demise…won’t someone think of the corporation…
It’s a dull knife. The only thing more dangerous than a sharp knife, is a dull one.
Came here to say this hahahahhahahahaha!! That’s rich coming from google hahaha
to have the no advertisement version.
You mean, “to have the less advertisement version”.
Edit: autocorrect
I can see that happening. There was a huge hype, both for LLMs, in general, and for “smart” digital assistants. Both of these hypes were capitalize on very strongly by expert marketers, who created a device that was supposed to be both (but was neither).
That’s good question. Not sure. I didn’t see that the article specified.
This is a high tech burn, if I’ve ever seen one hahahahahahahah
What strikes me as amazing, is that 5000 people actually found daily use out of this abomination lol
I set print screen as the shortcut for single button access.
The license, even if it’s truly just to avoid rust (for whatever dumbass reason they have), is enough to me to hardpass on the entire project.
That… … … was surreal…
Has this dude ever actually used the device? I highly doubt that. I appreciate the effort, I suppose, but you can’t properly review a product you’ve never used.
Oh good. We haven’t had a new ELE in about a year.
The cellular variant they’re talking about and the mesh variant don’t provide you internet access, they provides them access to your car and driving data, and you can’t control that. It doesn’t really give you any benefits.
Edit: and, also, cars shouldn’t be internet connected. Nothing will change my mind on that.