nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 年前Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopolytwitter.comexternal-linkmessage-square486linkfedilinkarrow-up1836arrow-down189
arrow-up1747arrow-down1external-linkDusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopolytwitter.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 年前message-square486linkfedilink
minus-squarenfntordr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·2 年前Only because EGS is trying to take market share, not because of the goodness of their own hearts.
minus-squarerambaroo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·2 年前So what? That’s also the only reason valve supports Linux.
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前And thereby fighting the Windows monopoly.
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Which they don’t do out of the goodness of their own hearts either.
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·2 年前Until we have proof that they increase their share of the profit when they reach a certain market share then that’s pure speculation on your part.
Only because EGS is trying to take market share, not because of the goodness of their own hearts.
So what? That’s also the only reason valve supports Linux.
And thereby fighting the Windows monopoly.
Which they don’t do out of the goodness of their own hearts either.
Until we have proof that they increase their share of the profit when they reach a certain market share then that’s pure speculation on your part.