- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
Should we hire more teachers, increase their funding? Nono, let’s do two hours of ai slop and call it a day.
Should we hire more teachers, increase their funding? Nono, let’s do two hours of ai slop and call it a day.
It’s only 2 hours a day at certain “Charter schools” (idk what those are and I flat out refuse to learn)
Having these LLMs just disseminating incorrect information to children is a good bit. Americans would rather be wrong than pay teachers more.
My wife had no idea what charter schools were and thought they sounded “neat”, so I had to learn and then explain to her how awful they are. TL;DR they are horrible and uniquely American.
They are essentially for-profit schools run within a public school district. They face fewer “regulations” on what they can do. The public school district pays the school money for each student who goes there. They sell themselves as having more ability to address issues in education “creatively” but in reality they just have non-union teachers who they can pay less. Americans are suckers for this because a lot of them buy into the notion that “competition makes for better education”. Practically speaking I can see two reasons they exist:
‘1. To make profit. That’s what this AI thing is about, it’s cheaper than teachers and the company that runs the school gets to keep that profit.
‘2. Some charter schools are sort of quasi- religious. Like, they can’t be openly religious but they will kinda sneak stuff in there. Lots of American Christians want their kids to get a religious education but can’t afford private religious school.
IIRC charter schools are also able to pick and choose the students with the highest test scores while blocking lower-scoring students from going to them. They then point to their schools having higher test scores as a reason why public schools should be further defunded.