A study that stoked enthusiasm for the now-disproven idea that a cheap malaria drug can treat COVID-19 has been retracted — more than four-and-a-half years after it was published.

… Its eventual withdrawal, on the grounds of concerns over ethical approval and doubts about the conduct of the research, marks the 28th retraction for co-author Didier Raoult, a French microbiologist, formerly at Marseille’s Hospital-University Institute Mediterranean Infection (IHU), who shot to global prominence in the pandemic. French investigations found that he and the IHU had violated ethics-approval protocols in numerous studies, and Raoult has now retired.

“Why it took more than four-and-a-half years after the study was initially published for the journal to come to this conclusion is not clear. It is also somewhat surprising that most of the paper’s authors still stand by study’s findings and conclusions despite its obvious inconsistencies, methodological flaws and potential ethical issues as outlined in the retraction note,” says Søgaard.

The paper (now marked as retracted): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949

  • Radin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    What are you even talking about? I can’t tell if you’re for or against the retraction of this obviously flawed study.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Pretty sure they are saying that vaccines are proven to help everyone, and that morons (RFK Jr, etc.) want to destroy them because vaccines helps black people.

      I hope that is what they are saying.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yes, the comment could use some light editing (and capitalization) but that’s correct.