Speaking in terms of the popular response

      • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It was, but it kicked off the Civil War just a few years later. In terms of making people get off their asses and do the right thing* it’s solidly in first place so far.

        *Only after much kicking, screaming, denial, and eventual failure to deliver fully on the true end of slavery in the US.

        • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Yeah I think saying he kicked off the civil war is a huge reach

          It happened because of economics not because the north grew a conscience or feared imminent uprising

          also slavery still isn’t truly ended, let alone legally ended

          • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It 100% would’ve happened anyway, but Harper’s Ferry was the fire under the southern aristocracy’s ass to go through with it because suddenly there was a very real example of a northerner actively instigating mass slave rebellions to destroy their way of life. Had it not happened, the civil war might not have occurred for another decade or two instead of within five years.

    • HamManBad [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Oh I didn’t even consider that. I guess I was thinking more of an assassination of a powerful American with a generally positive approval from the public. That’s like the one thing Americans usually won’t stomach. John Brown “only” took over a military compound