• Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    In terms of carbon emissions, not even close. In terms of environmental impact, not really. In terms of societal impact, a car is a car, the fewer the better.

    • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      it halves it but its still not nearly enough for a green transition. things like ebikes, trams, trains, e-buses, etc. are much more important to focus on over cars

      • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        For sure buses, bicycles, and trains would be miles and miles better for the environment and for society, but halving emissions is not “almost as bad.”

        The best car is still no car.

        • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I think the issue is these are categories as measured. Regional train infrastructure is ass and doesnt have many passengers if it were modernized it may be fine

        • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Its e scooters used by those ride sharing apps afaik, those have gigantic turnover. Normal e scooters are right above ebikes