• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The original comment doesnt include anything about objects… It only talks about tasks and people asking you to complete tasks.

    Ofcourse you cant rape an object, but the comment wasnt talking about that, it was talking about something much more generalized.

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 days ago

      The post does point out that there’s a table full of penis models (so essentially dildos) and that the task is to put a condom on one of them.

      A bodyless fake penis is clearly not a sentient being so the only way a violation of consent happened if consent applied to inanimate objects. That is, of course, a ridiculous and easily attacked proposition.

      In the end this would be an example of trying to make a valid point but making it in a clumsy way.

    • Undaunted@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      You really have to get into that mercenary mindset. You’re obviously not responsible for your actions, if you’re just executing tasks someone else wants you to do. Smh