• AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Actually the problem is not that hard to solve unless you are trying to be deliberately obnoxious:

    You say “no binario\a” depending to the noun it defines. It’s correct to say no binaria because it refers to a person (in spanish persona, female noun).

    But it’s also ok to say no binario if you refer to a human being (ser humano in spanish, this one male noun).

      • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Because not all the words that are gendered refer to a single gender. I understand when we change the last vowel to an e to add a non gendered version of a word that has both male and female forms (e.g. nosotros/as, spanish for “we”, would do great with a nosotres). But when the word itself is already non gendered (as persona, which although is considered female, refers to any person of any kind, because there is no male alternative) I don’t see a reason to do it.

        There is no discrimination in referring to someone as a persona, since there is no “persono” word, so saying persona no binaria will offend only who wants to be offended.

    • redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yes but if you’re not deliberately obnoxious how can you possibly signal to the world just how virtuous you are?