The political-military origins of the EZNL are found in the National Liberation Forces (FLN), a clandestine organization formed at the end of the 1960s in northern Mexico, inspired by the Cuban revolution, the FLN organized a guerrilla struggle with the aim of achieving the construction of socialism in Mexico. But some time later, in the early 1970s, they ended their activities abruptly when their structure in Mexico City was discovered by state security forces and many of their militants, both in Chiapas and Mexico City, were brutally assassinated. However, its survivors did not give up and managed to reorganize and settle in 1983 in Chiapas, pursuing the same objectives. However, in order to achieve their objectives, they formed the EZLN and a social base to sustain it.

The main social base of the EZLN is in the indigenous municipalities of the Cañadas region, the highlands and the northern zone of Chiapas. A large number of the commanders are indigenous and, at least since 1993, the military apparatus has been subordinated to a council of delegates from the Zapatista communities called the Clandestine Revolutionary Indigenous Clandestine Committee (CCRI). The indigenous communities in the country have a long history of exploitation, abandonment and exclusion from national political and economic life, and have strengthened their community organization, while historically leading various social movements in search of improving their living conditions, preserving their traditions and customs or for their self-determination and government; The jungle zone and the highlands of Chiapas are no exception, so the guerrilla group that arrived there found an already highly politicized indigenous society, with experience in mobilization and with permanent communication with diverse political and social organizations; The little or no response to their demands on the part of federal, state or local authorities, and the permanent violation of their fundamental rights, may explain, on the one hand, the reasons why they opted for the armed struggle in 1994. On the other hand, their growing participation in the Zapatista uprising reinforced the indigenous character of the EZLN, which quickly integrated their demands in its program and discourse, which generated that during the negotiations with the federal government, a process was initiated to establish a new relationship between the State and the indigenous peoples of the country. The EZLN, on behalf of the national indigenous movement, incorporated the demands and proposals of the various indigenous representations of the country.

Being the indigenous peasants “support bases” for the EZLN, we can highlight five forms of cooperation between these two groups: safeguarding the clandestinity of the insurgents; recruiting new combatants; guaranteeing supplies to sustain the guerrillas; participating in protest mobilizations; and carrying out collective infrastructure work and (inter)community services. These functions strengthen the bonds of (inter)community solidarity, increase social integration and strengthen a “Zapatista identity”.

In the 1994 uprising in Chiapas, the EZLN demanded the vindication of the ownership of the lands taken from the indigenous communities, a better distribution of wealth and the participation of the different ethnic groups in the organization of the state and the country; the reaction of the federal government was to send troops to Chiapas to quell the rebellion. The mobilizations of the civil society stopped the attacks and after 12 days of armed conflict, the federal government unilaterally declared a ceasefire.

The talks between the EZLN and the federal government ended with the signing in February 1996 of the San Andres Accords on “Indigenous Rights and Culture”, which committed the State to recognize indigenous peoples constitutionally and to grant them autonomy. The dialogues also gave rise to the foundation of the National Indigenous Congress (CNI) on October 12, 1996, a movement of indigenous peoples, neighborhoods, tribes, nations, collectives and organizations, with the slogan “Never again a Mexico without us” and with the objective of the integral reconstitution of the indigenous peoples. In March 1995, the Commission for Concord and Pacification (COCOPA), a bicameral legislative commission made up of the Mexican Chamber of Deputies and Senate, was formed to assist in the dialogue process.

Shortly after they were signed, the San Andres Accords were ignored by President Ernesto Zedillo. A policy of encirclement and siege, organized by the federal and local governments with the support of landowners and cattle ranchers, organized paramilitary forces trained by the army itself and allocated considerable resources to the cooptation of citizens and groups, while at the same time accentuating the expulsion of opponents from their lands and villages.

COCOPA, which was charged with drafting a proposal for constitutional reform that would include the main consensuses established in the San Andres Accords, presented its initiative to the parties in November 1996; the EZLN accepted the proposal; the President, although he accepted it at first, soon proposed modifications that substantially changed the proposal, without recognizing the rights of the indigenous peoples, and without recognizing any compromise. The peace process became bogged down.

In 2003, the EZLN announced the creation of Los Caracoles and the Good Government Councils, which reinforced the principle of “commanding by obeying”, -they listen, do, decide and command, obeying the communities and their territorial organizations-, and in the autonomy they allow to propose a strong project of networks with national and international possibilities. Since its creation, Zapatista teachers and doctors have been trained and schools and clinics have been built. In addition, a justice system has been developed which is used by both Zapatistas and other members of society, as it is more efficient than the institutional system.

The Caracoles, in the words of Pablo González Casanova, “open new possibilities of resistance and autonomy for the indigenous peoples of Mexico and the world, a resistance that includes all social sectors that fight for democracy, freedom and justice for all”.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

    • PaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      waow-based

      Vile lemmitors who imagine themselves as somehow better than reddit-logo users despite acting exactly the same and having created literally exactly the same spaces but seemingly devoid (there must be a few right???) of the rare, few, real people who actually have souls not rotted away by years and years of narwhal bacon imperial core settler ideology and fake email factory tech jobs that can sometimes be found on reddit-logo cuz of its popularity and absorption of so many internet forums into itself (unlimited “”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”““Eternal September””“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“” on reddit-logo qin-shi-huangdi-fireball)

      Genuinely pathetic behavior tbh. This person obviously considers themself to be some kind of ally or part of the working class but when one of the workers being whined about and shit on actually gives his perspective (sry for talking about you in the third person lol, it seems to makes all my verbs and tenses or whatever agree) and asks them to self-crit, they won’t. Instead, they use the same language meant to support and uphold the rights of workers to put down and shut up a worker. I live with lots of contradictions in my beliefs and life like anyone else but I can’t imagine living that one without my brain completely exploding

      A7thStone, if you somehow read this… why would you say that? The request for you to critique your beliefs may not have been put in the perfect reddit-logo polite, civil pearl-clutch, sanitized way but it shouldn’t have to be. I hope I am somehow misunderstanding you

      I am refraining from posting more from that thread cuz of where we are lol. I would join in if I had a reddit.world-connected acct hehe

      You’re so real for trying to make those libs think lol. I worked for Amazon for just a few months (I literally could not do it any more, my brain just shut down one day and I walked out, went home and cried for a while), not as a delivery driver, but I imagine it is similarly or even more… DIFFICULT agony-wholesome. Idk how unaware, out of touch, and heartless you would have to be to willingly participate in that thread and say shit about how you should call cops about delivery drivers and how they park, truly wild and actually kinda makes me sad :( I’ve never been but would the real FuckCars subreddit even allow that?

      Have limited posting energy so is difficult for me to express when I read about peoples’ lives on this site (I saw but didn’t reply to UlyssesT leaving, coming back, and leaving again from lack of energy) but I think I read most of your posts about stuff, was happy to hear you got back on your feet in spite of all the stuff your ex-friend did and the grueling Amazon job meow-hug