Bureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.netBanned from community to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 10 months agoCheck out the tats on Pete Hegseth, Trumps new defense secretaryhexbear.netexternal-linkmessage-square74linkfedilinkarrow-up1165arrow-down11
arrow-up1164arrow-down1external-linkCheck out the tats on Pete Hegseth, Trumps new defense secretaryhexbear.netBureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.netBanned from community to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square74linkfedilink
minus-squareAcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up44·10 months agoI think MDCCLXXV is supposed to be 1776 even though it actually means 1775, that would also go under the second bullet point
minus-squareSickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up52·10 months agoBattles of Lexington and Concord were 1775; the shootiest Americans tend to highlight that over the declaration.
minus-squareCammy [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 months agoGlad to be able to identify another fashy symbol
minus-squareBureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.netBanned from communityOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·10 months ago 1775 Fun fact! That’s the birth year of the US Army. So it was likely on purpose, unfortunately.
I think MDCCLXXV is supposed to be 1776 even though it actually means 1775, that would also go under the second bullet point
Battles of Lexington and Concord were 1775; the shootiest Americans tend to highlight that over the declaration.
Very normal
TIL
Glad to be able to identify another fashy symbol
Fun fact! That’s the birth year of the US Army. So it was likely on purpose, unfortunately.