Bureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days agoBureaucrat Mega Threadhexbear.netexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-linkBureaucrat Mega Threadhexbear.netBureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days ago(idk what permanent revolution is about, it’s a cool name though)
minus-squareBureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 days agoIt’s from Trotsky https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1931/tpr/pr10.htm So it’s an opposition to the “Socialism in one country” of USSR, though maybe there are other meanings (like what we first think about when we hear “permanent”)
minus-squareBureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoHow about we do Socialism in one country in our comm and permanent revolution outside of it? Would that be dialectic?
(idk what permanent revolution is about, it’s a cool name though)
It’s from Trotsky https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1931/tpr/pr10.htm
So it’s an opposition to the “Socialism in one country” of USSR, though maybe there are other meanings (like what we first think about when we hear “permanent”)
How about we do Socialism in one country in our comm and permanent revolution outside of it? Would that be dialectic?