• MischievousTomato@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s nice. Hopefully it getting more notorious means that HW companies will support it better. But, at the same time, if this is just from the Steam Deck, then, kinda fugged

    • rainroar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno, I see the steam deck as a huge win for Linux. It shows people how simple Linux gaming can be.

        • Contend6248@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Proton?

          Valve puming money in the Steamdeck is paying off for everybody gaming on Linux.

          It made me pull the trigger again and this time i’m not even dual booting.

          • EthanolParty@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            and this time i’m not even dual booting.

            I’m so close to doing the same thing. We’re at the point where proton compatibility is good enough that most of the games in my library work. And even if a game truly doesn’t work on Linux at all, I just talk myself out of buying it anyway.

            I think I pretty much only boot up Windows once every few weeks to keep it updated.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Proton?

            Valve puming money in the Steamdeck is paying off for everybody gaming on Linux.

            It’s a double-edged sword though. It means there’s no point in developing native Linux games, because it’ll run through Proton anyway. Keeping Windows the default gaming platform still, and making Steam the only way to acquire games if you wanna play on Linux. You CAN add non-steam games to Steam, but they’re not guaranteed to work. I don’t know if you can also run Proton without Steam because I’ve never needed to try, but that would be a hassle for your average user.

            • Contend6248@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              There was never a chance in hell that AAA games are natively coming to Linux. I rather have them now with a compatibility layer and gain some market space, we’ll go from there then

              • boonhet@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not at the current market share, sure, but Microsoft is doing a lot to alienate people with new restrictions slowly being built in. Vulkan being good helps too, but now thanks to proton there’s no need to move from d3d12 to Vulkan, which is kinda sad.

                • MischievousTomato@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Either there’s proton and people can play or there is no proton and no linux users and no steam deck. This is a thing where you need to recognize you can’t win

            • MischievousTomato@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly, I doubt we’ll ever see native linux games be the norm. Windows isn’t going away anytime soon, your average joe most likely move to linux, so it’s cheaper and just as good for companies to just target proton.

        • sleepyTonia@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          But if some gaming peripheral maker wants to advertise Steam Deck support they will essentially have to support Linux at least!

      • MischievousTomato@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know. I myself am planning to get a new laptop next year and I’m in a dilemma between an expensive macbook pro or an expensive thinkpad x1 yoga. Similarly priced.

        • letbelight@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you care about battery, well you need to consider macbook, they have better battery management, just I don’t know how it’s under linux. 2nd if it’s design, go twith macbook. If it’s not then always go with Thinkpad.

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have a Z13 with AMD (not Intel) & after a year of heavy use exclusively on Linux, I still regularly get 5–11 hours battery and sleep/hibernate works fine. There’s not too many situations where I wouldn’t have an opportunity to charge in there. Previous Intel laptops (even Evo) could barely get 6 & I’d need to carry a power brick to a café if I needed to compile like anything.

            • letbelight@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              So AMD is better on battery nowdays? Seems I need to save up and try one with fedora.

              Thanks for sharing!

            • MischievousTomato@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wish I could love AMD, but after being hit by the drm/amd#1455 bug, I can’t ever. I’m quite happy with intel and my battery life is the same as when I used windows, so all is fine.

          • MischievousTomato@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I care about both design and battery, but I’m willing to compromise on battery because I’ll still depend on x86 for games and some other stuff I believe. I like the design of the thinkpads too, black + red is a very kino combo.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At this point it’s also a question of operating system, because Asahi Linux is not ready for general usage, so to get a good experience on an Apple Silicon Macbook you need to be running MacOS still. The performance and battery life will blow the X1 Yoga out of the water I believe, and the Mac build quality is superb, but until Asahi gets better, you’ll be a bit restricted.

          Good news is, the drivers from Asahi are also slowly making their way upstream I believe, so in the future, other distros can be run on Mac hardware too.

          • MischievousTomato@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t plan on running Asahi ever. One of the big reasons I would want a mac is because I wanna try MacOS for myself. Also, I want a thinkpad with an intel meteor lake soc, which will be a radical upgrade. I’m quite hyped

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you want to use MacOS, the new Macs are all superb. I have a Pro from work and an Air of my own and they’re amazing machines.