When faced with the prospects of actually paying workers a far wage, these companies are doing everything they can to prevent it. Says a lot about their priorities.

  • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    “How are we supposed to pay slave wages if you force us to treat our employees independent contractors with a minimum level of decency? Think of the venture capital that could be lost if we don’t become profitable!”

    Glad to see these companies are flailing. If you can’t afford to pay a minimum wage that keeps up with inflation then your company shouldn’t exist.

    • jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll just do what they did in Cali and change the NY constitution to redefine “employee”

    • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      So many tech companies use the independent contractor thing to get around having to pay taxes and provide benefits. It’s pretty fucking gross

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, fuck those companies. Though I did love back when Grubhub was constantly cranking out these ridiculous offers to lure customers in. That was kinda nice…

  • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it makes complete sense that they’re fighting this hard once you realize their business models are only remotely viable because they exploit the fuck out of their workers.

  • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh how I want to see this completely fail. And more importantly to see the steam coming out of their ears when it does.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The linked WaPo article has a little more detail. Here’s the core of it:

    DoorDash and Grubhub argue in a joint lawsuit that the rule is based on “inherently biased and unreliable survey data” and would hurt delivery drivers rather than help them.

    If the rule goes through, the companies say, the increased costs would be passed on to consumers, which would result in fewer customers for delivery workers to deliver to and “injure its goodwill within the industry,” according to court filings.

    In a separate lawsuit, Uber said the increased minimum wage would hurt local restaurants because the higher costs could dissuade customers from ordering.