• Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    Discrediting someone usually has a goal of pushing customers to another source though. There is no other source of this information, so what would be the point?

    • qfe0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      108
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Destroy a source of historical documents so that the past can be contested. Sow doubt, confusion, deniability. Hide evidence of past crimes, or inconvenient documents. Plant documents, etc.

      • bamfic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Russians banned it, russian hackers trying to destroy it, at least it’s consistent

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sow doubt. As in spreading it like seeds to take root and grow. 100% in agreement with you, just being a grammar Nazi. Carry on.

      • Gigasser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Lol, we should create a society of sorts along the lines of the original Bavarian Illuminati. Create a decentralized storage network and archive of knowledge and history. Create a list of important shit that needs to be archived, and delegate standardized chunks (let’s say 5 or 10gb each chunk) of data that are to be downloaded by people. Anytime 5 or 10 people have downloaded a chunk, strike it off the list of priority archival and move onto the next chunk. For this to work, needs alot of people though.