Deceptichum@quokk.au to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoguess I'll just play with my nutsquokk.auimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1967arrow-down124
arrow-up1943arrow-down1imageguess I'll just play with my nutsquokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.au to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·1 day agoI assume the people are passionate about grammar, and their corrections have nothing to do with respecting trademarks.
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·edit-21 day agothat’s even worse! especially because the vast majority of self proclaimed “grammar nazis” (really weird fucking title, guys) don’t know shit about linguistics as a science
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoobligatory Mitchell and Webb https://youtu.be/qmVnr7rsWrE
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down5·1 day agoLegos is grammatically correct.
minus-squaregedaliyah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·23 hours agoNo, that’s Lego. Legos is a large metropolitan city in southwestern Nigeria.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·22 hours agono, that’s Lagos. Legos is a principle of rhetoric along with pathos and ethos.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 day agoWhich should be your original comment instead of the trademark thing.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agono, I don’t care if it’s grammatically correct.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-222 hours agoGreat, doesn’t change the fact nobody is passionate about protecting trademarks as you are saying.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·22 hours agoyes they are, because the word Legos has nothing to do with grammar
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·22 hours agoSo what? Them being wrong about grammar doesn’t change the fact they are speaking about grammar.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-213 hours agono they aren’t. they’re talking about a trademark.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoYes, about the grammar of a word that happens to be a trademark.
I assume the people are passionate about grammar, and their corrections have nothing to do with respecting trademarks.
that’s even worse! especially because the vast majority of self proclaimed “grammar nazis” (really weird fucking title, guys) don’t know shit about linguistics as a science
obligatory Mitchell and Webb https://youtu.be/qmVnr7rsWrE
Legos is grammatically correct.
No, that’s Lego. Legos is a large metropolitan city in southwestern Nigeria.
no, that’s Lagos. Legos is a principle of rhetoric along with pathos and ethos.
Which should be your original comment instead of the trademark thing.
no, I don’t care if it’s grammatically correct.
Great, doesn’t change the fact nobody is passionate about protecting trademarks as you are saying.
yes they are, because the word Legos has nothing to do with grammar
So what? Them being wrong about grammar doesn’t change the fact they are speaking about grammar.
no they aren’t. they’re talking about a trademark.
Yes, about the grammar of a word that happens to be a trademark.