It’s a chud buzzword I hear often. It’s something something “prioritizing diversity at the expense of quality” which makes no sense because the whole point of DEI is to make the workplace more welcoming not targeting obviously impossible and bullshit quotas. Yes DEI is handled horribly because usually the actual policies fail to help employees from marginalized groups work with the same level of proficiency required to do their job.

          • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
            11·
            28 days ago

            Anecdotal, but when I was working maintenance in Florida I had a co-worker from P.R who was a welder before inhaling some nasty fumes and being forced to go on disability. He worked part-time with me doing maintenance; and I found out that despite knowing as much as I did and being older with more experience he was getting paid 2 dollars less than I was.

            Basically being the only maintenance guys that place had, me and him went up to my [redacted] church nazi boss at the time and threatened to quit unless we “fixed the difference”. She was ready to let us go until the priest there demanded she keep us because some bullshit “stations of the cross” holiday was coming up.

            That was an example of racial bias in pay difference despite overwhelming qualities of the other person. Not particularly “unqualified” like you asked; but if this happens so commonly that I can just throw an anecdote at you…what makes you think that it doesn’t happen on far worse scales across the entire country?

  • kivork [he/them]@lemmygrad.ml
    22·
    29 days ago

    They’re not real. I’ve worked at multiple places with DEI initiatives. They amount to a yearly training where white people get to vent their bigotry and a position within HR devoted to focusing on more inclusive recruitment tactics.

    For the most part we still hired almost exclusively white people.

    In reality DEI was just a way for companies to pretend they’re cool places to work and DEI was dropped the moment it started getting backlash.

    • trashxeos@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
      13·
      29 days ago

      Hell, even places where affirmative action WAS used it was barely used. 5-4 had a good breakdown of it but essentially it went from actually being designed to fix structural inequality in college admissions to barely being a tie breaker when two equally qualified admissions applicants were fighting for one of the last possible seats. It was like a watered down marinara, weak sauce!

      • kivork [he/them]@lemmygrad.ml
        10·
        28 days ago

        Pretty much in my experience. I’m sure there were some people who worked with companies to help with DEI initiatives who were doing so in good faith, but ultimately the system doesn’t work in a way that would allow change.

        HR departments are naturally responsible for any diversity training and practices, but HR is beholden to the interests of executives and investors who don’t care at all.

        That’s why the only reason any inclusive practice is ever adopted is because of regulation or because companies think they can get an edge in marketing.

        It just makes chud whining even dumber because if they understood how the businesses they pretend to worship work then they’d know that these practices are just capitalism doing capitalism things, which they claim to support.